...uhhh...we're not?
AVincentInSpace
none of the things in this picture involve silicon in any way
For a start, my name's not Clyde, it's Vincent. It's in my username. Thought you'd've figured that out. Second, it's an argument about why letting a bunch of individuals who have no incentive to care what happens to the group go wild with no previously-agreed-upon restrictions about how much they should use is bad, and that's not true of any socialist movements I'm aware of. Thirdly, the photo on the Wikipedia page for tragedy of the commons is of pollution.
There are statements about ecology that don't. Also, you didn't answer my question.
Are you absolutely positive you're a leftist? Because people who are left of center don't typically call each other "eco-fascists" for pointing out easily verifiable facts about ecology that do not involve human interference in any way.
The tragedy of the commons, an argument as to why unfettered capitalism is bad, is right wing (i.e. pro-capitalist) propaganda.
I've officially heard it all now.
in theory i would like this but i cannot help but feel like this level of white-on-black uncrossed-A minimalism borders on the corporate
and the 10 people total who actually do are in for a rude awakening once they realize what canadian politics are like
i don't think that's ai, bud
another quality post from geneva_convenience
"Remember, kids, blatant, sweeping misandry isn't bad because painting -- no matter how you slice it -- literally half of society as rapists and murderers and sex-crazed lunatics whose only thought is for animalistic dominance over anyone standing near them is a lie so big and so dangerous it'd give Trump a run for his money, it's bad because if a transmasc person reads an 'all men are bad' post, they might think it's about them and be sad, and then you'd be hurting someone we actually care about."
It sickens me that these people call themselves feminists. You can fight for trans rights and women's rights without doing it to the exclusion of everyone else.