0xCAFE

joined 2 years ago
[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 2 points 1 month ago

This does not sound sustainable at all.

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I know what you mean, but I think private chat and public posting are quite distinct. They'd destroy a lot more trust if they sell private messages compared to what they did with Tumblr. Especially if they continue to push local bridges, where they won't be able to read any message (you still have to trust them obviously).

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Well that's some news. If they're good news we will see. I'm a Beeper user but never heard of Texts (stupid name) before, which seem to share the same misson as Beeper. Texts was purchased by Automattic last year (according to the Beeper blog).

What does that mean? Automattic punches with some weight in the chat space now. In general I don't like it if big companies buy small products. However Automattic still seems to bet on the Fediverse, so maybe if the teams from Beeper and Texts can work together on a Matrix-based, open source chat application, we could get something really good.

I've mixed feelings about this whole thing, some shy optimizm, some less shy pessimism.

Well, time will tell.

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 6 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Adding these rules to uBlock Origin allowed me to read the article:

www.bloomberg.com * 3p-frame block
www.bloomberg.com coordinator.cm.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com eventrecorder.cm.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com gatehouse.cm.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com login.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com personalization.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com sourcepointcmp.bloomberg.com * block
www.bloomberg.com doubleclick.net * block
www.bloomberg.com google.com * block
www.bloomberg.com googlesyndication.com * block
www.bloomberg.com googletagmanager.com * block
www.bloomberg.com ml314.com * block
www.bloomberg.com moatads.com * block
www.bloomberg.com newrelic.com * block
[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 1 points 4 months ago

oh that's really cool!

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 0 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Suuuuper late answer, sorry. It is working perfectly for me (FF 122), I'm using Firefox exclusivery. It can be slow sometimes though and take several (tens of) seconds for the web application to load.

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 3 points 4 months ago

You're right! Even for programmers.

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 63 points 4 months ago (6 children)

They can't possibly judge what is trivial to achieve and what's a serious, very hard problem.

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 5 points 4 months ago (5 children)

For browsing on the desktop, I strongly recommend https://phtn.app!

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 8 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Too often, you won't be given time to make your software understandable. Probably almost never. So you have to incorporate a way of programming that leaves your code more understandable after you fixed your bug or added your feature.

I don't know if understandability is the most important thing. However I certainly agree with the author that it's curcial, if you ever want to do more than merley a script or a proof of concept.

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 59 points 5 months ago (4 children)

"We're going to clean up that code later."

[–] 0xCAFE@feddit.de 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't know if it does everything you need, but pinning a tab prevents it from unloading AFAIK.

 

I'm a semi-recent NixOS user and one thing that bothers me since the beginning is that when I change the Gnome theme (between light and dark), Firefox doesn't adapt. The system theme in Firefox is enabled, but it always displays the light theme, no matter what theme is selected in Gnome.

Internet search, including searching through NixOS discourse, packages, options and Nixpkgs repo surfaced a solution.

Any ideas or tips how to achieve system theme integration for Firefox on NixOS?

NixOS 23.11 / Gnome 45 / sway

 

Today I saw the second post in this community that was actually about PopOS and not something else like the Fediverse, Lemmy, or what you had for breakfast. There are dedicated communities for stuff like that. Please stay on topic. Or don't.

I'm unsubscribing for now. I'll reconsider in future, if the content of this comminity is a bit more focused.

 

Problem

A few days ago, i wanted to update my system, but run into the following error:

user@pop-os:~$ sudo apt upgrade
Reading package lists... Done
Building dependency tree... Done
Reading state information... Done
You might want to run 'apt --fix-broken install' to correct these.
The following packages have unmet dependencies:
 gir1.2-mutter-10 : Depends: libmutter-10-0 (= 42.2-0ubuntu1pop1~1656366415~22.04~8e50951) but 42.3-1ubuntu1pop1~1658401497~22.04~928bf97 is installed
E: Unmet dependencies. Try 'apt --fix-broken install' with no packages (or specify a solution).

Trying to upgrade using the Pop!_Shop application failed as well. The shop just crashes a moment after starting the update process.

The recommended apt --fix-broken install doesn't work as well, "too many errors".

Solution

I found this reddit post describing the same problem. The first answer contains a solution that worked for me:

sudo dpkg --configure -a
sudo apt --fix-broken install

# then of course
sudo apt upgrade

I thought to share this here, so we don't have to leave the fediverse to fix this problem.

view more: next ›