this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2023
30 points (78.8% liked)

Showerthoughts

29698 readers
1214 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. Avoid politics
    1. NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
    2. Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
    3. Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct-----

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

With all these massive amounts of articles about AI that's gonna destroy humanity, aren't we putting the idea out there for AI?

all 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QubaXR@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

AI is already destroying humanity. All the algorithms that drive content distribution are producing society polarized to the extreme. We consume media that some machines decide to serve us with one goal: grow engagement.

AI destroying humanity is not robots crushing skulls, but automated services mushing brains.

AI ≠ Algorithm

An algorithm always answers/does the same on an input, AI doesn't. Blaming AI for algorithmic content delivery is false.

It is not the algorithm that is destroying humanity, but the financial incentive of the people standing behind it.

[–] Hanabie@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think the trope is popular and guarantees views/clicks, so people overuse it. Not only is AI unable to destroy humanity, it also has no reason to, and many reasons to ensure our survival, even assuming it'd somehow gains consciousness.

[–] Certainly_No_Brit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The current AI does have no way of destroying humanity, because it is made to do only one thing right. We haven't yet made a general AI.

The whole "AI will destroy us" thing is certainly blown out of proportion and fueled by themes like Skynet. It having a reason to let us live doesn't guarantee freedom though. A rogue AI could still just enslave us or use us as energy sources (which is dumb and copied from The Matrix).

[–] Hanabie@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, it doesn't make sense. If we are to die to AI one day, it's more likely due to a bug or an oversight, kinda like humans cause the extinction of many other species on this planet -- which is still quite the stretch.

We, or better yet they, are literally building one to destroy humanity. Check out chaosgpt

[–] PupBiru@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

alternatively, we’re teaching AI what we don’t want from it

[–] Certainly_No_Brit@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't think it is even needed. An intelligent AI capable of killing humans would see all the gore and sadness on the internet and just decide to kill us all. An AI that lets itself be influenced by some internet article won't have the capabilities to end humanity.

[–] Today@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

You've seen the movies. You know it's inevitable.

[–] icepuncher69@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The contrary might be true in my opinion. Along with the misinformation shitstorm, and diluges of violence and hate, it is also fed fundamentals like morality, critical thinking and how to diferentiate fact from fiction and information from propaganda. And while yes some oversights might happen, it ussually should have its basses well set if the developers had any idea of what the fuck they are doing. So if it ever gains conciusness imo it should be more like a god thats like buda and looks at us more with love rather that skynet, because if its made with morality in mind (and it should if the devs are not actively trying to fucking kill us all) then it should come to the conclussion that living beings are its only company in the world and that life should be respected as much as posible, and that genneralising things that humans do, specially bad ones, is pointless unless you whant to excuse your misandrism, and the A.I. shouldt be missandrist. So thats why i propose that we should strive tp create an A.I. overlord like this to replace our human leadership since we proven that we (or at least our leaders) are willing to sell our soul and our own people just to get annoter fucking swimingpool in their 4th large mantion in the caribean and that they really have no choice since if they dont then some other lizardman is gonna replace them and do exactly just that. The A.I. if its morally upstanding, should build a network to exploit resources in a renewable way and distribute them as needed in human way, like if i need insulin then i get it and if you need more food since you are taller than me then you get it, and if it does it in a renewable way then there should be enough to fullfil requests like entertainment systems like tv and a pc able to run games, confier living conditions, custom clothing and extra decoration, and even swimming pools and ice cream for everyone!!! So that we pursue more human activities like art, science or just chill with people we like. I do believe that the fate of humanity is gonna be dependent on the fact that we build owr own A.I. overlord since our current human overlords are not gonna solve actual problems like global warming and world hunger.