this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2023
299 points (98.4% liked)

politics

18315 readers
4699 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former Vice President Mike Pence said he would comply with the law if he were compelled to testify in former President Donald Trump’s trial in the 2020 election case.

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

he says that now… when the time comes, however, exactly what will his “compliance” look like?

sure, I believe he’d show up, but I also believe he’ll give mostly equivocations, pleas to the 5th, non-remembrances, and non-answer answers that mostly cover his own ass and deflect blame from the GOP than testimony that would give any real insight to or damning evidence against Trump or his co-conspirators.

If Pence had any desire to serve justice, he would have done so long, long ago.

[–] stinky613@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

he’ll give mostly equivocations, pleas to the 5th, non-remembrances, and non-answer answers that mostly cover his own ass and deflect blame from the GOP th

That's certainly what he's done in the media, but I'm not so sure that's how he'll respond when 1) he's answering narrow questions crafted by an experienced attorney and 2) he's answering questions after having sworn to God that he would tell the truth

[–] keeb420@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

the traitor also swore on the bible hed uphold the constitution from all enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC

[–] whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

his displayed pattern of behavior for the past several decades has been a hateful, self-serving scumbag. why would that suddenly change now?

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The question is, is that hate and self serving aimed at trump now?

[–] whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

this is my take on what’s happening with him now: it’s political posturing. he knows he’s likely to be called at least for a deposition, and he’s getting in front of the media coverage by offering, or, at least, by saying he’d be cooperative. now, to a public audience, that can mean whatever we want it to mean, and to his base, that means he’s an angel who did nothing wrong, a patriot deserving of their vote. because he’s a law-abiding victim!

to the discerning listener, it’s a cover-his-ass declaration meaning nothing much now and whatever he wants it to mean later, especially if he changes his mind, as the legal and media landscape remains fluid between now and then. what will actually transpire? we’ll have to wait and see.

[–] WarmSoda@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pence? I don't like the guy for his religious ideologies, but that man is furious at what Trump did to him on Jan 6.

I don't think he'll go above and beyond to bury Trump, but he won't be putting impediments to the prosecution at all.

[–] whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

yeah, he hates trump, but he loves the GOP, and hurting Trump hurts the GOP.

and while I don’t think he’d hurt the prosecution, I have serious doubts as to how much he’d actually help them.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Interesting that "Republican intends to comply with the law" is seen as a newsworthy event ....

[–] flossdaily@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Pence: "I won't break the law."

Great. You wanna cookie or something?

[–] Pratai@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Who knew that complying with the law was an elective for politicians that swear on bibles to respect their position and serve the country.

Good thing he decided to be a good guy!

[–] Hextic@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

uhhh I don't rEcALL,

X1000000

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But … I don’t know what the path of this indictment will be,” he told CNN’s Dana Bash in an interview that aired Sunday on “State of the Union.”

“But actually there are profound issues around this, pertaining to the First Amendment, freedom of speech and the rest.

Trump on Thursday pleaded not guilty in a Washington, DC, courthouse to four criminal charges – including conspiracy to defraud the United States – related to the investigation led by special counsel Jack Smith into attempts to overturn the 2020 presidential election.

The federal judge who will preside over the case intends to set a trial date at the next hearing on August 28.

In his interview with CNN, Pence said Trump “was wrong then, and he’s wrong now” on the idea that Pence, as vice president presiding over Congress’ count of the Electoral College vote, had a right to reject the election result.

On Saturday evening, Trump claimed in a Truth Social post that “I never told … Pence to put me above the Constitution,” calling the former vice president “delusional.”


I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only Mike Pence could trip on such a low bar.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Go back to Russia.

[–] xc2215x@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Glad Pence will. He needs to do so.

[–] FReddit@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Pence reminds me of Wormtongue in LOTR.

He has the guts of an earthworm.

[–] Magzmak@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So grateful for this. He's a pos but atleast he has some shadow of integrity

[–] whiskeypickle@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this isn’t integrity. it’s entirely self-interest.

if he had integrity, he would have come out with all of what he knew long ago, especially when he was subpoenaed by congress when they were conducting their investigation— a subpoena he refused to comply with, btw.