this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2023
128 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10167 readers
89 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Prosecutors from Special Counsel Jack Smith’s office are seeking a protective order after Donald Trump posted an apparent threat on Truth Social on Friday. Citing the former president’s all-caps declaration, “IF YOU GO AFTER ME, I’M COMING AFTER YOU!” prosecutors said his posts could have a “harmful chilling effect” on witnesses in the case against him if he were to start publicly posting information obtained in discovery. The DOJ is therefore asking a judge for a protective order blocking the “improper dissemination or use of discovery materials.” Prosecutors noted in their filing that the order is especially important since “the defendant has previously issued public statements on social media regarding witnesses, judges, attorneys and others associated with legal matters pending against him.”

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] randomwords@midwest.social 46 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Throw this traitor in jail already. Why is he allowed to continue this behavior?

[–] Snipe_AT@lemmy.atay.dev 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I think they call it “due process”.

[–] ulkesh@beehaw.org 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

And if it were literally anyone else, they would have been put in prison while awaiting trial due to their clear and present danger of inciting violence and retaliation.

I do not understand why everyone walks on eggshells around this asshole.

[–] MJBrune@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

They don't want to make him a martyr.

[–] Intelligence_Gap@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At the very least with this approach when he’s found guilty there will be no argument for impropriety or unfair treatment that could be used to get him out.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

No good faith argument. But many are not willing to confine themselves to good faith.

[–] ArtZuron@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

As if having no argument has stopped Magats before. They thrive on ignorance and malice.

[–] Snipe_AT@lemmy.atay.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

We have to be especially careful with people with significant resources. Any small mistakes caused by moving quickly can be leveraged for less consequences do to technicalities. In these cases, being reactionary is a detriment.

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

How is it a mistake in this case to remand the defendant?

[–] randomwords@midwest.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes being in jail while awaiting trial is very common for people who behave badly on bail or are poor.

He should be treated the same as everyone else and await his trial in jail for his poor behavior and for being a flight risk.

[–] StringTheory@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, the guy has a private plane and properties in foreign counties and friends in places out of the US’s reach. Certainly more of a flight risk than most folks..

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago

A person doesn't stay out on bail when they're intimidating witnesses

[–] ericjmorey@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Millions of people are jailed pending trial.

[–] Snipe_AT@lemmy.atay.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Indeed, and many are allowed to go about their lives while awaiting trial.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 15 points 1 year ago

Jan 6 v2 - indictment boogaloo

[–] glacier@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What are they going to do? Take his phone away?

[–] trashhalo@beehaw.org 35 points 1 year ago

Yes. That's exactly what they would do if it was anyone else. Your bail would be revoked. Or you would be tossed in jail for contempt of court.

[–] Midnitte@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Demonstrates just how dangerous he is - sit back and commit stochastic terrorism through your followers.

[–] sardonic@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

Tell him he's a bad bad boy

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

I genuinely would not want to be connected with any of the people charging and trying him. I'd be looking over my shoulder more than I do when I walk through a bad neighborhood at night.