boardgames

Munchkin. I guess nowadays hating on Munchkin is no longer unpopular, but when I first played it the game had a rabid cult following. I understand that it might be fun to play with alcohol involved and with everyone just looking to have a good time and to laugh at silly things happening, but as a game where all the players are playing with the intention of winning the game isn't enjoyable to me at all.

Being a fan of engine/tableau builder, Wingspan really disappointed me. It's not a bad game. It a very nice game, but the flow is average, at most.

Depicts some interesting ideas that push me to buy it with it's first expansion (goal board, mix of engine and tableau building) it's hugely luck based and the fact this game is rated 8+ on BGG, that tends to rate games mostly on advanced mechanisms and long run, is still a mystery to me.

I give it 5 plays with different peoples. Yet, I had no fun at all (I mean, zero… Watching flies around was the funniest part of my last game, sadly)… Then I played 51st State, which is a very good (yet not awesome) engine builder and have instant fun from start to end. The feeling of controlling things.

There are some highly rated games on BGG, and while I like some better than others, the ratings never seems off to me. Like “mmh, OK, I see why peoples like it”. But this offset has never been so huge with Wingspan.

So yes, I have it on my shelf, I watch its wonderful box like a disturbing mirror of my gaming tastes, knowing it's praised by many, but I could almost try to find another table just when someone come up with the idea, while I usually really force myself to play games with different peoples because I know you will make peoples happy.

First time in my 20y of gaming, and it makes me feel so weird.

Thanks for reading me.

For me this is Lost ruins of Arnak. The game is a sort of deckbuilder but it never feels like it. It also left us with the impression that you need to min/max from turn 1 and there is only a limited way to victory. Its on our list of games to resell. Do not understand the appeal

Mage Knight. This game threw me in to an unbridaled rage with how much I loathed it. I couldn't understand why it was rated so highly. So, I went to BGG to see just how so many people could like this awful game.

Turns out everyone plays it cooperatively. Not a soul plays nor recommends the competitive mode; the mode I was playing in.

Monopoly. It’s only fun if you are winning and you don’t like your opponents.

@dpunked My gaming group lives by Terraforming Mars. I’ll play it but I just can’t get into it. I strongly prefer Ares Expedition, but they don’t. #firstworldproblems

We tried Mysterium and it wasn't really a great experience. It's probably better if you get the hang of it, but we have a lot of other games to try before that point, so que será será

Probably quite lukewarm at this point, but Gloomhaven. Too much effort to set up and manage, losing often is annoying, losing often with no consequences for losing is even more annoying. It always felt like it would be better as a video game, and guess what? There is one now. It's probably good.

Probably Scythe. It was fun the first couple times when we were figuring it out, but very quickly every game ends up feeling the same.

Settlers of Catan is one of the worst board games ever made. I will die on this hill.

Probably Everdell. Just seemed to be very much style over substance. If you were lucky you could get some synergies going but luck is the key word there. The huge deck means there's no guarantee what you need is going to come up in the game at all.

Kind of feels like if you want a nature themed tableau thing Wingspan does it better.

Ticket to Ride unfortunately did nothing for me.

My friends and I had been playing mostly Catan for about 5 years before we tried Ticket to Ride. It just didn't feel very strategic, but maybe that's because it was our first time playing. It felt like the cards you were dealt basically determined whether or not you would win, and "blocking" someone else didn't feel like it was truly worth the effort. Years later, my CS and EE professor would say how it was a fun game because of how it actually resembled some problems in networking, but I just never grasped that level of depth.

Didn't know that some of these were turned into board games.

Stone Age. Worker placement and set collection point salad and not much else.

For me it would probably be “7th continent”. It just feels a bit undercooked and the rules are vague in a way that’s really frustrating. People really like it on BGG but I don’t get it.

Axis and Allies. I dunno, maybe I've just lost patience as I get older, but the 2 times I tried playing it with my group we spent so much time going over the rules and setting up the board that we really didn't get it enjoy it much.

Börenpark, was just boring.

No real competition for tiles, no real race to the finish.

Ark Nova - I just had very bad starting cards and couldn't mitigate it, so I was doomed to be behind the whole game. Seriously with that big number of cards you can just get very unlucky and have no good combo available. It's too much chance in this game, but I might just be more of an Euro game fan...

Santorini. I played it with my wife at our LGS a few years ago. The game was over too quickly, and it didn’t feel too rewarding.

Risk. Just rolling the dice and let the highest one win would be an equally well designed game.