this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2023
56 points (95.2% liked)

Science

13191 readers
60 users here now

Subscribe to see new publications and popular science coverage of current research on your homepage


founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Neuron@lemm.ee 48 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The headline left out something important from the article and posed a false dichotomy, a minority of harvested crabs are being used to develop medicines, and most of those are released and survive. The vast majority that are killed are being harvested for use as bait in commercial fishing. Seems like that's the obvious thing to cut back on to save the humans, the crabs, and the birds.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even worse, there is already a synthetic available, which is approved in Europe

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So basically we're choosing to kill a bird because we can't rely on corporations to cut back?

[–] DoctorWhookah@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Yep. Can’t cut into profits. What would our investors think?

[–] Applejuicy@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

Besides urging companies to stop this practice, stop eating fish.

[–] penguin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

Obviously, that's the one that's off the table. The choice is strictly between developing medicine or saving a species.

And I think we all know the birds are the ones who will have to go.

- Capitalism

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Also, it looks more like climate change is what's fucking over the spawning of horseshoe crabs. Not blood harvesting. Eggs need a specific temperature to survive.

[–] literallyacat@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sorry but, was the whole successfully cloning animals thing just a fever dream? Is there a reason we can't be doing that for something like this? (Disclaimer: am stupid, pls ELI5)

[–] notfromhere@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I, too, would like to know if we shared the same fever dream.

[–] ekky43@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

If I remember right, cloning is banned in most places. Or at least there was talk about banning cloning in the EU in the early 10's.

[–] Dreyns@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Cloning is not a magical tool with scifi vats etc it's taking dna and placing it in an embryo and puting it back in an animal womb, here breeding would be more on point. But I too am stupid, this is my take on it from what I know.

[–] MadgePickles@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Horseshoe crabs not blue crabs

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Horseshoe "blood" is blue, and it's not actually blood it's hemolymph. It is blue crab blood. Blue blood from a crab.

[–] MadgePickles@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Blue blood from a horseshoe crab yes. Blue crabs are also a thing and horseshoe crabs are always referred to with the word horseshoe in front. So calling them just crabs with the word blue in front is a poor choice if one cares about communication.

[–] 133arc585@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

horseshoe crabs are always referred to with the word horseshoe in front

They weren't in this case, so that "always" seems to be a stretch.

if one cares about communication.

It's made clear in the article. If one cares about communication they're reading past a headline.

[–] MadgePickles@lemmy.dbzer0.com 0 points 1 year ago

I don't know why you want to fight about this

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

It's a Fortune 500 article. They aren't very good on things like this. They mean the blue blood from horseshoe crabs.

[–] DrrringBat@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Better headline: East Coast States Fail to Protect Resource Vital to Medicine Production

[–] borkcorkedforks@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ideally we should find a replacement for that horseshoe crab blood or perhaps a way to raise them in captivity. Maybe someone could come up with something to give the crabs to offset the damage caused by taking the blood. The issue might not even be primarily due to the blood with everything else happening climate change wise.

There might be ways to improve things for the birds but animals with super specific niches just kinda run the risk of becoming extinct. I feel similar about Pandas and Koalas.

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago

Already have

"A synthetic alternative was later invented and has since been approved in Europe as an equivalent to the ingredient that requires horseshoe crabs. But in the U.S., the blood harvest isn't shrinking. It's growing." - source

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Stop terrorizing animals for stupid overpopulated people.

[–] DrrringBat@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Better headline: East Coast States Fail to Protect Resource Vital to Medicine Production

[–] Papercrane@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The horseshoe crab is a bird? Lol wat? Anyway why isn't it possible to create the blood in a lab or breed the crab/bird?

[–] AttackBunny@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

There is already a synthetic version approved in EU. US just refuses to use it. NPR article about it

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The horseshoe crab is a bird? Lol wat?

Did you read beyond the headline?

[–] Papercrane@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

I did after responding. I just think the headline has tried to fit as much information as possible but is a bit confusing doing so

[–] garyyo@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

To be honest, I too headed straight for the comments without reading the article. But I didn't comment till I read it. It's also not technically a crab either, despite being called one.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Literacy: Not even once!

[–] xxkickassjackxx@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 year ago

Personally I’m team human so…. Sorry bird