this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

20 readers
4 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 2 years ago
 

Say hello to ionocaloric cooling.

all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.ade1696

Fuck Science for paywalling research. May they rot in hell.

The article implies they are using electric charge to bring the ions into and out of solution to trigger melting and recrystalization. Does anyone have actual details about the process?

Also, is this paper saying it has a COP of 0.3? That's terrible compared to typical evaporative refrigeration.

[–] cogman@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

2 major problems with this.

  1. The melting and freezing point of various materials is fixed. This is something that may work great at 90F but not so great at 100F.

  2. Unless I'm reading this wrong, this requires the transport of solids or salty liquids. That's going to be a challenge. Salty liquids tend to be corrosive and solids aren't easily pumped places.

Beyond that, the article assumes that all refrigerants have high gwp. The industry is currently in the process of moving to either CO2 or propane. Both of which have fairly small gwp. They do have their own problems, CO2 needs high pressure and propane is explosive. However, they are workable and already in use.

The key reason we use gas is it can cold (or heat) at pretty wide temperature ranges.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Still waiting for the reverse cycle microwave...

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Putting salt on roads to prevent ice from forming is a common example of this in action.

A better example: lots of people use salt to force the ice to melt, to chill their beer faster. It's the exact same principle as in the article.

The main issue is entropy - it's hard to remove the salt off the liquid, to make it a solid again, if you want a continuous process. But perhaps if you use a "brine" vs. pure liquid, reverse osmosis could do the trick?

The second issue is that you need to work with a rather specific range of temperatures; make it too high and the liquid won't become solid again, make it too low and it won't melt even if you add the salt. This could be also solved by "bootstrapping" the process with the older HFC-based one, you're still reducing HFC usage this way albeit not completely.

[–] admiralteal@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I doubt you could use an RO-like process for that. Aside from the filters needing servicing, you don't really have closed loop RO. You'd have to plumb your appliance.

My reading of this write-up is that they can push the ions in with an electric charge and they'll leave the solution when the charge is removed. The paper says they are able to trigger melting and recrystallization.

[–] Imajustlayhere@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

This post made me fix my refrigerator thank you

[–] Ragnell@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I JUST bought a new refrigerator yesterday and already it's obsolete.