this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
121 points (99.2% liked)

PC Gaming

10232 readers
698 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments, within reason.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Daelsky@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 hours ago

Lmao 69m$ is kinda funny.

Can’t wait to see them not innovate again and be bailed out by the American taxpayers

[–] Bluefalcon@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 6 hours ago

But billionaires pay taxes!

[–] TommySoda@lemmy.world 56 points 10 hours ago

And in a week, 500 - 2000 people will get laid off to "save money."

[–] TTH4P@lemm.ee 82 points 11 hours ago
[–] balssh@lemm.ee 10 points 10 hours ago (3 children)

I’m really curious how the new CEO will change things.

[–] shawn1122@lemm.ee 3 points 3 hours ago

Apprently he's turned a few companies around before. Intel stock went up last week so people seem to have some confidence in him.

[–] alphabethunter@lemmy.world 20 points 8 hours ago

Narrator: "He won't"

[–] AceBonobo@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Paddzr@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

At least instead of having 69 million salary, he has to work for the other 68 and deliver? Here's hoping...

[–] ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca 4 points 9 hours ago

Unfortunately as the article points out it’s all buried in terms and conditions