this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
-1 points (33.3% liked)

No Stupid Questions

2557 readers
28 users here now

There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!

Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!

Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice ๐Ÿ‰.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Kokomheart@lemmy.ca
otter@lemmy.ca
-1
Is there any other way to interpret these comments (convo between a 20 year old and 14 year old) (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/nostupidquestions@lemmy.ca
8 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I found this channel https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9GULvtVCe-I and I'm going to post the screenshots below. The video has links in the description which prove the screenshots are genuine. For clarification, the 20 year old knew the 14 year old was 14 prior to these comments being made.

T, the person with the green avatar and geometric name, says that the pedophile allegation is slander, because people can't speak for another person's intentions and people are interpreting those comments the wrong way.

I'm trying to get an unbiased judgment of these comments here. is there any other way those comments T posted could be interpreted?

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] streetfestival@lemmy.ca 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know much about shipping (ie, fan fiction content that is usually focused on new sexual/romantic relationships between characters) but no, shipping without pedophilia is not equivalent to shipping with pedophilia - not in terms of it's 'potential for scandal,' criminality, or ethics.

I think your judgement to call out that person's pedophilia (that involves a minor IRL) was sound. Their minimization of their behaviour does not surprise me. One barometer I use for this is lemmynsfw.com's moderation policies. Underage AI content (and any kind of underage content) is forbidden. Protecting children from sexual abuse is a hard line in society, as it should be; and it's everyone's job to offer protection however they can

[โ€“] ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee -2 points 21 hours ago

Was it sound though? You don't know these peoples' ages, their local legal ages, or the context. Plus this was years ago, and the whole point of this person's account, as I mentioned, is to do nothing but slander someone for trivial obsolete matters in order to get back at them on this gullible community.

[โ€“] bran_buckler@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Am I having deja vu or is this a repost from a few weeks ago?

[โ€“] ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee -2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

It's called slander. They signed up just for this purpose, to get back at the individual they mention by means of taking things out of context. I even went in length about it.

When OP says they "found this channel", that should be the first sign, as it's absolute BS. It's also a channel that's well known for being transphobic, many people have gone into length about this.

[โ€“] ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

I don't see anything transphobic in the video I linked. Also, there are links showing that those comments really exist. You spammed my other thread, you seem very invested in it, so why don't you answer the question?

deviantart.com/comments/18/2617047/4886760940

deviantart.com/comments/18/2612773/4879845792

[โ€“] ShiverMeTimbers@lemm.ee -2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Ask again so we're clear. Do that while I answer how it's transphobic with three points.

  1. The channel misgenders everyone it doesn't like.
  2. It allied itself with an incel who was transphobic, including towards one of the people it was claiming to protect from, ironically, transphobia (all because the supposed suspect was the person the channel was made to slander in the first place, and the person they were supposedly trying to protect from transphobia even called the channel out on that as well as the fact it's a slander channel).
  3. Said person who the channel claimed it was protecting from transphobia has BPD and has mental health issues stemming from his experiences, and could have used encouragement from those same people who claimed were protecting him from transphobia, with Triagonal even sending an SOS signal to the people who were slandering her, but oh no, it wasn't about the person the channel was made to look bad looking bad, so nothing was said.
[โ€“] ItsJannnneee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Okay, and? This post isn't about the channel but the screenshots that were posted there.