this post was submitted on 10 Mar 2025
657 points (99.5% liked)

Science Memes

13166 readers
3165 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] daw@feddit.org 14 points 1 day ago

annas-archive.org

You might have to switch your DNS to one that doesn't block based on copyright

(e.g. Cloudflare: 1.1.1.1)

Actually i think the effort they are making is cool. It goes well beyond piracy and I think is a good idea esp in face of the world rn.

[–] Geodad@lemm.ee 61 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I refuse to pay to view papers. Knowledge should be free to anyone who wants it.

[–] Animated_beans@lemmy.world 37 points 2 days ago (4 children)

If research is funded by tax dollars, then it should absolutely be free for everyone to have access to.

I'm not sure how I feel about private research being required to be free to all (does it disencentivize research to let everyone learn from what you paid to learn?). Either way, if the tax payer pays for something, they deserve free access to learn from it.

[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 1 points 13 hours ago

France have made this law, I think. More countries should follow their example

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 38 points 2 days ago (1 children)

private research can go ahead and charge to be viewed, and enjoy no one else giving a flying fuck about their presumably heavily biased research.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 15 hours ago

That works if there's enough public funding, but given trends lately and events most recently...

[–] Clent@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

Fuck copyrights.

[–] Genius@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago

All corporations benefit from public services.

Elsevier is organized crime.

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

PLEASE CONSIDER TO DONATE TO A SCI-HUB INSTANCE OF YOUR PREFERENCE

1000058335

[–] Slatlun@lemmy.ml 24 points 2 days ago

Also, donate your time to review papers, an absolutely critical part of "peer reviewed journals", for the people charging you both.

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Qeios is pretty cool.

(Open access non-profit journal that charges less than 30 USD to publish)

[–] mexicancartel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Every journal chages > 30 USD smh

[–] FundMECFSResearch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

I’m dumb. < 30 USD was what I meant

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

>_>^ ^<_<

>_<

[–] 18107@aussie.zone 10 points 2 days ago
[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago

We don't pay for shit. Universities and taxpayers do.
It will be interesting to see what cutting university funding does to publishers who may realize that half their "customers" can't afford their services and have to turn to (quote/unquote) piracy. On the one hand I'm optimistic of a price adjustment. On the otherhand, a nagging suspicion that nothing good can come from the sudden lack of access to research creeps upon me.