this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2025
157 points (98.8% liked)

politics

21655 readers
6872 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A bill that would ban the use of mRNA vaccines, including for Covid-19, is on its way to the House floor after passing out of committee in a party-line vote Wednesday.

Sponsored by Rep. Greg Kmetz, R-Miles City, and co-sponsored by Northwest Montana Reps. Tracy Sharp, R-Polson, and Lukas Schubert, R-Kalispell, House Bill 371 would prohibit administering vaccines developed with mRNA, or messenger ribonucleic acid, technology on humans. The bill deems the technology, which was employed to create the Covid-19 vaccines, a hazard.

If you can, get a booster now. These motherfuckers will kill you for political gain.

Edit: Just to be clear, this is a state bill. But if they succeed at the state level, they'll move on to the national.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aubeynarf@lemmynsfw.com 80 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

FYI, it looks like this is the Montana state House, not the US House of Representatives

[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 40 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Thery are using the states as a testing ground for less popular and less justifiable policies to judge the reactions. This has nothing to do with vaccines being unsafe and everything to do with keeping the population scared and sick.

[–] FoxyFerengi@lemm.ee 5 points 3 weeks ago

Vaccination rates are already quite low in Montana (30% got covid boosters) , and it's hard to know just how many infections there have been because medical care is not very accessible in most of the state. The nyt reported one of every 289 Montana residents had died of covid by 2023.

[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

should check who owns hospitals... sick people love going there

[–] kryptonianCodeMonkey@lemmy.world 26 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

These people are dumb as fuck and don't even slightly understand what they are legislating. They are just politicizing scientific developments, drawing arbitrary lines, and attacking things on "the other side". mRNA vaccines could be a game changer for creating vaccines with fewer risks, but these stupid assholes can't be bothered to even learn how they work, why they are better, or they do "learn" but they listen to crackpot conspiracy theorists like RFK Jr. who lie about what it does or the dangers associated. This anti-intellectual bullshit has got to stop.

[–] AllNewTypeFace@leminal.space 24 points 3 weeks ago

The stupid, it burns

Montana State legislature but damn.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Any drug that might be used for abortions, a broad class of vaccinations…..

I mean this is how it starts. This is how eventually they tell you what you can and can’t do with your own body.

Before you know it they’ll come after SSRIs, vaccines that have “lead”, any vaccine that might cause injury, elective surgeries that deal with reproduction, and so on.

Because when they know they can get away with this, it makes them bolder in their schemes.

I find it unsurprising but fascinating that the group routinely known for yelling slippery slope is nowhere to be found. It’s like they didn’t give an actual shit to begin with.

[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] NABDad@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Government small enough to fit inside a needle.

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 20 points 3 weeks ago

Americans toss cancer cure tech out window because they love Trump and had to wear a mask.

[–] Dimmer@leminal.space 16 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Vaccine trip to other states will be good business.

Letting pandemic killing the poorer and the weaker part of population is essentially building an open air gas chamber.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 6 points 3 weeks ago

Flipping through the first few chapters of "The Masque of the Red Death" and all I can think about is how Prince Prospero can fuck around forever and will never ever find out.

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 10 points 3 weeks ago

Jesus fucking christ. Soon we're going to be fleeing to other countries as climate and healthcare refugees.

[–] aramis87@fedia.io 10 points 3 weeks ago

If this goes through (I hope it doesn't, but don't know enough about Montana to say), folks should be aware that there's a third FDA-approved covid vaccine that doesn't use the mRNA technology. It's a more traditional protein subunit vaccine and it's called NovaVax. It's slightly less effective than the mRNA vaccines, but there's data showing that the resistance lasts a bit longer.

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

That Carl Sagan quote about the service economy is fucking slapping right now.

[–] deus@lemmy.world 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Here's the quote, for those like me who had never heard of it:

"I have a foreboding of an America in my children's or grandchildren's time -- when the United States is a service and information economy; when nearly all the manufacturing industries have slipped away to other countries; when awesome technological powers are in the hands of a very few, and no one representing the public interest can even grasp the issues; when the people have lost the ability to set their own agendas or knowledgeably question those in authority; when, clutching our crystals and nervously consulting our horoscopes, our critical faculties in decline, unable to distinguish between what feels good and what's true, we slide, almost without noticing, back into superstition and darkness...

The dumbing down of American is most evident in the slow decay of substantive content in the enormously influential media, the 30 second sound bites (now down to 10 seconds or less), lowest common denominator programming, credulous presentations on pseudoscience and superstition, but especially a kind of celebration of ignorance."

–Carl Sagan, The Demon-Haunted World

[–] conditional_soup@lemm.ee 1 points 3 weeks ago
[–] DemandtheOxfordComma@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Let's just ban science. I mean had science ever done anything? /s

[–] lost_faith@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 weeks ago

Nah, it is just a money sink that accomplishes absolutely nothing, nothing at all. I mean, the way I am communicating with you now makes no sense, how am I doing this? Telepathy?

[–] cabron_offsets@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago
[–] davidagain@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

The Republicans already aren't taking covid vaccines. They want to ban it for other folks because they don't like that there side is dying and getting sick in higher numbers.

I mean, there's an alternative route, but admitting you were wrong is crime number one in the Republican mind.

[–] serenissi@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What's wrong with mRNA vaccines, politically or medically?

[–] accideath@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Politically: it‘s evil because it’s new and was first used for the covid vaccine.

[–] dipcart@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Remember when they said it was about their freedom to choose? When they said they're problem was that its not right to force it onto people? Obviously lies and bullshit then, but what's the argument here?

Like seriously, what's the argument against letting people choose? Isn't that what you wanted? Because when there is tons of evidence that vaccines are good and safe, you can still choose to not have them. So, hypothetically, if that flipped and they were able to get some "evidence" vaccines are bad and dangerous, wouldn't it still be your right to choose? Just like it was their right to choose, even when it shouldn't have been.

It goes without saying, obviously hypocrisy, but holy shit. And the unfortunate thing is that it is much easier to prevent vaccines than it is to supply them.