this post was submitted on 13 Jan 2025
237 points (99.6% liked)

linuxmemes

23363 readers
2093 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack users for any reason. This includes using blanket terms, like "every user of thing".
  • Don't get baited into back-and-forth insults. We are not animals.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, <loves/tolerates/hates> systemd, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.
  • 5. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§ Language/язык/Sprache
  • This is primarily an English-speaking community. πŸ‡¬πŸ‡§πŸ‡¦πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ
  • Comments written in other languages are allowed.
  • The substance of a post should be comprehensible for people who only speak English.
  • Titles and post bodies written in other languages will be allowed, but only as long as the above rule is observed.
  • 6. (NEW!) Regarding public figuresWe all have our opinions, and certain public figures can be divisive. Keep in mind that this is a community for memes and light-hearted fun, not for airing grievances or leveling accusations.
  • Keep discussions polite and free of disparagement.
  • We are never in possession of all of the facts. Defamatory comments will not be tolerated.
  • Discussions that get too heated will be locked and offending comments removed.
  • Β 

    Please report posts and comments that break these rules!


    Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.

    founded 2 years ago
    MODERATORS
     
    top 24 comments
    sorted by: hot top controversial new old
    [–] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Rhel 5? I hope y'all are using microsegmentation and have a good firewall.....JFC

    [–] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)
    [–] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    I am not. I worked hard to make our application support RHEL 8 and then RHEL 9. And then the politics takes over and the big wigs start an extended bickering over who should pay for the OS upgrade... which never happens. Sometimes hardware partners don't support the upgrades, which means OS upgrades also end up requiring new hardware.

    I blame Redhat.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    Surely your pay is much more than a RHEL license.

    If nothing else you could move to Debian or Rocky Linux.

    [–] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    There is something you need to know about collective wisdom; the larger the org is, the lower it gets. Yes the application works on Alma 8 and 9, but the management says 'no'.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 month ago

    Yes and no

    A healthy organization shouldn't be having this issue.

    [–] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

    The only way that will work is to somehow quit and rejoin as a much more highly paid consultant and enable them to upgrade EOL software in prod. I am actually considering this.

    [–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    IT installed a firewall between the legacy environment and everything else. Devs threw a fit and so the firewall was configured with a default allow rule. Security was last seen crying into their beer.

    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    I'd get out before it implodes. This sounds like a poorly managed company. When something bad happens they will find escape goats.

    [–] sylver_dragon@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

    they will find escape goats.

    Well now I want to stick around. Who wouldn't want an escape goat?

    [–] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Unsupported versions are unsupported.

    [–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago

    mission critical, but not enough to warrant a budget for redundancy.

    [–] FlexibleToast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

    Weird how that works...

    [–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    RHEL 7 and RHEL 5 need to be flipped in your meme.

    Any large enterprise still running RHEL 5 in Prod (or even, yes, older RHEL versions) has fully accepted the risks and will grumble about supporting it, but go forward with whatever workarounds are necessary to keep the application running on it running. The RHEL 7 folks, however, are modern enough that the answer for any problem is "Upgrade to RHEL 9, because we know you can with some effort, because we don't want to waste time on supporting something you should be able to upgrade away from".

    This is the game of chicken in a modern enterprise for app teams. If their application is critical enough to business continuity and they remain on RHEL 7 long enough, they too will join the select few applications in the org that either get a cash injection for an application rewrite to modern RHEL 9 or be enshrined next to the RHEL 5 apps still running with grumbling, but continued support.

    In a perfect world these EOL unsupported OSes should be retired and replaced with modern supported version, but we're talking about reality now which is what the modern enterprise is, and which is far far from the perfect world.

    [–] felbane@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    What's blowing my mind about this entire thread is the "rewrite application to support RHEL9" thing I keep seeing. What the fuck applications are y'all running that are so tightly bound to the OS that they can't handle library and/or kernel updates?

    [–] recarsion@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 month ago

    That's what I'm thinking too but then remember my first corporate job where the application depended on an exact subversion of Java 8, no earlier and no later. This was in 2021. Knowing that company I'd bet they're still rocking the same setup.

    [–] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

    Any large enterprise still running RHEL 5 in Prod (or even, yes, older RHEL versions) has fully accepted the risks

    It is more like 'involuntarily end up riding the risks of using unsupported old software'. RHEL 7 and RHEL 5 are in the right order.

    RHEL sells an unrealistic expectation that you don't need to worry about the OS for another 10 years, so the enterprise gets designed around it and becomes unable to handle an OS upgrade, ever.

    [–] lengau@midwest.social 12 points 1 month ago
    [–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    You aren't using a EOL system in production right? If you are it better be air gapped. The last thing we need is more zombie machines for the botnets.

    "What do you mean? That's the clinical best practise!!" - Siemens healthcare/Philips or any other medical vendor

    (and I'm not talking about air gaps!)

    [–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

    HPC? Fuck we can't change shit in HPC. We tried a few times... Some sites appear manage it, but tend to forget a few dozen systems.

    [–] akash_rawal@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

    I understand how it feels.

    [–] bruhduh@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

    Some manufacturers machines still run dos