this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2025
133 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37833 readers
495 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Meta deleted nonbinary and trans themes for its Messenger app this week, around the same time that the company announced it would change its rules to allow users to declare that LGBTQ+ people are “mentally ill,” 404 Media has learned.

all 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aedyr@lemmy.ca 34 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Zuck scrambling to be a bootlicker for the incoming administration.

[–] roadrunnerr@lemm.ee 7 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

Trump has been pro gay marriage 100 percent of his presidency, as per the 60 minutes interview he did just a few days after being elected in ‘16. The previous President can’t say the same. Why didn’t these huge bootlicking efforts of removing profile icons happen in 2017-2020 during his first term?

I’m not disagreeing that could be what’s happening here to some degree but I’m also not 100 percent convinced that Trump is going to take notice of a small UI/profile customization change in an app he almost certainly doesn’t use with any regularity himself.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 55 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Just making it clear that it wasn't about freedom of expression or speech. True freedom of speech would mean keeping these even if it made other people uncomfortable.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

I agree with you, but true free speech also gives Facebook the right to choose its own themes. I'd vote with my feet on this one, but I already abandoned Facebook years ago.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 27 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I know, it's just that they said they're removing moderation for "free speech" and then remove one of the ways you can express themselves. Just hypocritical.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 5 points 13 hours ago

For sure. Any social media company that says they're pro free speech is just posturing at best. They have full dictator control of their systems.

[–] krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Facebook's free speech, not yours.

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Yes. I don't have any guaranteed speech rights on Facebook.

[–] krimsonbun@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 44 minutes ago

I am well aware. However, it's a bit misleading to rebrand yourself as a free speech platform but limit the speech you don't like.

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 40 points 16 hours ago

It begins. Fascism requires enemies within and without.