this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2023
583 points (95.3% liked)

Mildly Infuriating

35084 readers
687 users here now

Home to all things "Mildly Infuriating" Not infuriating, not enraging. Mildly Infuriating. All posts should reflect that.

I want my day mildly ruined, not completely ruined. Please remember to refrain from reposting old content. If you post a post from reddit it is good practice to include a link and credit the OP. I'm not about stealing content!

It's just good to get something in this website for casual viewing whilst refreshing original content is added overtime.


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means: -No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...


7. Content should match the theme of this community.


-Content should be Mildly infuriating.

-At this time we permit content that is infuriating until an infuriating community is made available.

...


8. Reposting of Reddit content is permitted, try to credit the OC.


-Please consider crediting the OC when reposting content. A name of the user or a link to the original post is sufficient.

...

...


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Lemmy Review

2.Lemmy Be Wholesome

3.Lemmy Shitpost

4.No Stupid Questions

5.You Should Know

6.Credible Defense


Reach out to LillianVS for inclusion on the sidebar.

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PotjiePig@lemmy.world 77 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

So we want free apps that offer everything and don't take your data or advertise. It must also have constant security updates and a fleet of developers keeping it running. Good Luck finding that unicorn.

I actually like this development. I'd much rather pay for a service with money over my privacy.

[–] cloaker@kbin.social 69 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Signal literally exists. Free.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 46 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s only free because they’re trusting users to donate. That method of generating income for their developers could stop working at any time. Lots of FLOSS projects struggle to find kosher funding.

[–] jkure2@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Come on dog this is literally just 'yeah well what if we imagine a hypothetical world where MY argument is right, how about that?'

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

> It’s only free because they’re trusting users to donate.

No, they sell their technology to Meta and Microsoft. WhatApp's encrypted protocol that was rolled out several years ago is Signal's. That's also why Signal will never match all features of those messengers. They cannot drive WhatsApp and such out of business because that would mean Signal is out of business.

[–] afunkysongaday@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No. Everyone can use Signal technology for free in their own products. They are not selling it to anyone. Yes, some time ago moxie helped to integrate their encryption algorithm in WhatsApp and that's that. Very likely that he / the foundation got paid for that service, but it's not like Signal is funded by selling their technology to anyone. And for sure it's not like they can't match WhatsApp features because then WhatsApp would go down the river and they run out of funding...

I don't know what to say but stuff like this makes me kinda angry. You read about moxie helping implement their encryption in WhatsApp at one point, and then came up with this story that Signal is somehow mainly funded by meta and Microsoft and can't compete with their products because it would put ms and meta out of business and endanger their own funding this way. Like, please don't make up stories like that, OK? It's not a nice thing to do.

If you are really interested here are some actual facts on the matter:

> On February 21, 2018, Moxie Marlinspike and WhatsApp co-founder Brian Acton announced the formation of the Signal Foundation, a 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization. The foundation was started with an initial $50 million loan from Acton, who had left WhatsApp's parent company, Facebook, in September 2017. The Freedom of the Press Foundation had previously served as the Signal project's fiscal sponsor and continued to accept donations on behalf of the project while the foundation's non-profit status was pending. By the end of 2018, the loan had increased to $105,000,400, which is due to be repaid on February 28, 2068. The loan is unsecured and at 0% interest.

Source: wiki. Took me five seconds to google that. Again please don't spread made up stories, thanks.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] noodle@feddit.uk 6 points 1 year ago

Large open source projects like Signal don't really rely on individual donations, but instead survive off wealthy supporters or sponsors.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] waka@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Signal uses donations to keep running. That's one of the reasons why they don't need to do this kind of crap. Kinda like Firefox.

It's sad to see that slowly but surely the Internet gets divided into the more and more useless giant sector and the free and open sector, which just doesn't get the attention it needs to be attractive enough for most to switch over. And then there's also this weird shadow area where I often hear those pirate chanties from...

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 30 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Firefox wants to rely on donations but in reality 90% of their funding comes from an advertising company.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the best open source projects out there. How bout we use our tax money to fund great free software for everybody?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] genfood@feddit.de 52 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] gosling@lemmy.world 94 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don't get how people expect services to stay free while also being against any kind of subscription or ads and barely donate to support these projects.

This isn't an essential feature they're paywalling. I don't even remember the last time I sent a voice note, let alone get one from a stranger. Feels more like a thank you from the devs for supporting them

[–] joao@aussie.zone 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'd understand paying for an active feature, like to SEND voice messages, but not having to pay to restrict spam sent my way.

[–] gosling@lemmy.world 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

This is VOICE MESSAGE we're talking about, not calls nor chats. You can already block calls from non contacts and create a folder to only show chats from your contact.

How many voice message spams have you received that you feel like this is a deal breaker and how is Signal an appropriate alternative in this regard, when it doesn't even have as many privacy options including this one?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

signal is the perfect messaging app for normies

[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I would generally agree with you, if it could allow you to sign-in on multiple devices, and share message history. I understand why it doesn't do either one, but it does cripple the experience

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Kyle@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I definitely prefer premium over my personal data being the product for "free".

As I get older I'm appreciating paid electronic services and content when done responsibly in exchange for a private ad-free and well done experience. But it's taking a lot to get over my decades of conditioning assuming everything on a computer and internet should be "free".

I've enjoyed my kagi premium search trial and seeing the prices is a bit much. But getting really good search results and having the webpage or search run so fast and seeing my ad blocker greyed out because there were no ads and trackers to block is surreal this day and age.

I just wish we had a better way of trusting telegram. The only thing encrypted by default is secret chats. I'd buy premium if it made all chats including group chats started by the user encrypted by default.

[–] irotsoma@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Yeah, problem with the fremium model is that they usually still collect and sell information on their premium users just the same as their free users. The premium just add some semi-essential features that they cut out for the free users. And finding truly 100% premium services that don't sell personal data is rare these days because that's where the money is for now, information. I don't mind paying for a good service, but I won't both pay and share my personal information, that's just paying twice.

[–] Pokethat@lemm.ee 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The issue is that is that now they have your billing address and credit card number

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

I totally agree with you, but it's the damn cable model all over again.

Pay us so we don't have to make money by selling you stuff.

Hey, we can still make money by selling them stuff.

[–] mrmanager@lemmy.today 7 points 1 year ago

Kagi is really, really good.

[–] Mugmoor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 1 year ago

And thats why I switched to Matrix and set up a Telegram bridge.

[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll stick with Signal thanks

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] JigglySackles@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I avoided using telegram when it asked for my phone number.

[–] woelkchen@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (2 children)

> I avoided using telegram when it asked for my phone number.

So you don't use Signal and Element either?

[–] min_fapper@iusearchlinux.fyi 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Element does not require a phone number. Signal does, and yes I don't use it for that reason.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] neonfire@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Never noticed because I've never received a single voice message in the 5+ years of using it. Then again, I only use it with friends and not large communities. I've had spam messages, but they're rare and just text talking about crypto.

[–] soulifix@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I keep forgetting why sometimes I even use Telegram. It's just there. I don't want their dumb subscription.

[–] gunnm@monero.town 11 points 1 year ago

You can use it without premium.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Polar@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I switched all of my friends and family to telegram in 2013. I deleted it 2 months ago. 10 years.

Telegram was so great. Always cutting edge, released so many features before anyone else, and the app always stayed extremely lightweight. What broke the camels back for me was them destroying transfer speeds for free users.

I have 1gbps internet connection, and videos and photos take FOREVER to download and send on telegram. Trying to send a short 30 second clip on telegram takes a good 90-120 seconds, even on the lowest compression.

Meanwhile snapchat and other apps take 3 seconds and look better?

They are trying to push their premium so hard, which is fine, gotta pay, but I'm sorry there's no chance in hell all of my friends and family are paying $7 CAD each per month.

At this point I've just switched to RCS messages for all of my Android friends, and Snapchat for my stubborn iOS friends.

[–] IDatedSuccubi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

For a long time it was ran on money that Durov made from VK and it's selling deal and had no ads, almost perfect development. It was a ton of money obviously, but we all knew it would run out sooner or later and then everything would change. I bought premium once because I wanted to support the project, and I still use it. Hopefully I won't have to use anything else, because I hate almost any other messenger.

Edit: forgot "would"

[–] Delta_44@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

EXACTLY.

Everyone else here is forgetting that Telegram is still pushing the limits and it's still one of the best app for messaging (the best in my opinion though), if they're recurring to this, it's because money aren't unlimited.

Shut the hell up you people: Telegram still isn't invading privacy and using anti-user practice, the hell you complaining about?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] figaro@lemdro.id 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Serious question - isn't snapchat an absolutely horrible messaging experience? The messages literally disappear, the app is shit, and the messaging interface is shit. And you can see when someone is actively reading the message. I hate all of that.

Do people seriously use it for day to day messaging with people?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›