this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2025
100 points (98.1% liked)

Ukraine

8402 readers
674 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

Donate to support Humanitarian Aid


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 14 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TomMasz@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

Ukraine is right to worry about the end of US aid. TFG is definitely not on their side.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

So a suicide drone with a small jet engine?

Impressive it is cheaper at 10k than the Shaheds which allegedly go for 15-30k and use a moped engine. But I am not sure if this counts as a missile which normally use solid fuel.

[–] carpelbridgesyndrome@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Its a drone with a pulse jet and a small warhead. It's basically a modern V1 production run. Being how pulse jets work I wouldn't be that suprised to learn two cycle engines are more expensive.

Oh cool I only knew of turbofans. TIL.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 0 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Is this headline really trying to imply that Ukraine developed an entire missle in the last 2 months? If that were the case, they'd never have needed foreign aid in the first place.

[–] bluGill@fedia.io 14 points 3 days ago

They have been working on lots of things since the war started. Given the restrictions on using western missiles I'm sure these were on the important list since the start of the war (and it wouldn't surprise me if they were in development as a 15 year project before). Small drones are fast and easy to make so they went all in on them early, but other things also got development. 2 years to deliver a missile sounds about right to me - they are much more complex than a small drone.

[–] Marduk73@sh.itjust.works 7 points 3 days ago

True. Downvoters clearly aren't engineers. I hope Ukraine will get all the support they require though.

[–] Docus@lemmy.world 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Where did you get β€˜2 months’ from?

The Trembita, under development since 2023,

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago

The election.

I was pointing out the sensationalist headline. The contents of the article are irrelevant. Obviously they've been developing this for longer than 2 months.

[–] Axiochus@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Fair point, Trump has only started existing two months ago.

[–] Vent@lemm.ee 5 points 3 days ago

Yes, and the USA is the only country providing aid to Ukraine πŸ™„

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

@Vent designing the missile is one thing. Getting a production facility up and running and protecting it from Russian bombardments while ensuring constant supply is a whole different thing.

Edit: and it's been under development since 2023. It doesn't look like it's been developed overnight somewhere in the last two months or so.
@Sunshine

[–] Burstar@sopuli.xyz 2 points 3 days ago

The og version isn't much better.

Ukraine’s Moscow-malleting doodlebug missile is about to become very important

That said 'completes development' instead of 'develops' would have been an, unlikely in this inexplicable era of minimum syllable headlines, improvement.