this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
720 points (89.0% liked)

Malicious Compliance

19593 readers
4 users here now

People conforming to the letter, but not the spirit, of a request. For now, this includes text posts, images, videos and links. Please ensure that the “malicious compliance” aspect is apparent - if you’re making a text post, be sure to explain this part; if it’s an image/video/link, use the “Body” field to elaborate.

======

======

Also check out the following communities:

!fakehistoryporn@lemmy.world !unethicallifeprotips@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DCLXVI@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

What a hero

[–] BigToe@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Imhotep@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So I thought I would look at the modlog

A comment was removed, starting with

Not really seeing [...]

by @Whirlybird@aussie.zone

Heavily downvoted sure, but what rule is it breaking?

[–] daniskarma@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

He is like: "I used the transphobia to destroy the transphobia"

[–] Diprount_Tomato@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uis@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

What is protest part? Not sure it is malicious compliance either because contestant was not rebirthed as woman. Not that it's possible unless you are buddhist.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›