this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
31 points (100.0% liked)

News

7 readers
7 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

The class-action lawsuit, filed Monday in federal court in Sacramento, says Cigna Corp. and Cigna Health and Life Insurance Co. rejected more than 300,000 payment claims in just two months last year.

all 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Metaright@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Insurance has to be among the most corrupt and evil industries in the world.

[–] perviouslyiner@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Health insurance especially - every other type of insurance is for things that you don't expect to happen. People can go their whole life without a car crash. Not so much for medical care.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i cannot comprehend how we let for-profit health insurance be a thing... these people literally only profit at the expense of human health. there is no further reduction.

profit from human suffering, and it employs millions of people. and the icing is, they make it seem like a 'benefit'.

[–] Uprise42@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

My wife and I may be part of this. They denied her 2 week hospital stay for preeclampsia and subsequent delivery as “unnecessary” and we foot the bill for the $17k stay

[–] Barns@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The algorithm?

If claim then reject;

[–] HubertManne@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Whats crazy is the providers show no incentive to try and get it through. The insurnace pays so little vs the billed amount that as long as they can get you to pay more than a tenth of the amount they get more.

[–] complacent_jerboa@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

cigna balls lol

(fuck insurance companies)

[–] falsem@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is this not fraud if it wasn't actually reviewed by a doctor?

[–] btaf45@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Although a doctor would be required to sign-off on the decision, their doctor simply reviews what the computer says So the doctor doesn't actually look at your individual case file like he should, he just rubberstamps in bulk all decisions spit out of the computer. So they will claim that they stay within the letter of the law by having a doctor "sign-off" on your decision, but in reality the doctor rubberstamps thousands of computer decisions all at once.