this post was submitted on 25 Dec 2024
-49 points (21.8% liked)

General Discussion

12138 readers
120 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
-49
Does Wikipedia protect your privacy? (genderdesk.wordpress.com)
submitted 22 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by wikipediasuckscoop@lemmy.world to c/general@lemmy.world
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 4 points 13 hours ago

Gee, I wonder what the answer to this question from "wikipediasuckscoop" will be...

[–] fuckwit_mcbumcrumble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Warning: This thread has been brigaded.

Ah the cry of brigading. The number 1 go to for when people's posts aren't well received.

[–] commie@lemmy.dbzer0.com -5 points 16 hours ago

there is a brigade originating from a post by the admin of ponder.cat, a user who habitually makes vague accusations of other users concealing their true motivations and intent.

they're toxic, and I'll be petitioning my admin to cease federation.

[–] danekrae@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago

What a funny coincidence, that this gets posted right after a spoiled villain cries about it's freedom of speech...

[–] PhilipTheBucket@ponder.cat 29 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

doxing Wikipedia volunteers to a court in India

This is a massive erroneous telling about what happened.

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdrdydkypv7o

Of course, Wikipedia is no stranger to controversy. It has faced various forms of censorship in at least 13 countries. China banned it in 2019 and Myanmar in 2021.

It has also had run-ins with the Russian government and courts. Moscow has blocked several pages critical of the government and courts have fined the Wikimedia Foundation for its refusal to remove these articles.

In 2023, Pakistan blocked the website for three days after it did not remove allegedly "blasphemous content".

Wikipedia was blocked in Turkey in April 2017 after it refused to delete articles critical of the country's government. Turkey's top court lifted the ban in 2020.

In India, experts say the platform is one of the few organisations that has pushed back against the federal government's orders to take down content.

The court has been ordering Wikipedia to take down the content, and reveal the identies of the users who added it, and Wikipedia has been fighting back against both orders.

Also note the subtle little dodge "doxing Wikipedia volunteers to a court." Wikipedia's offered compromise was to give some information about who added the material to the judge, under seal, and not to the ANI. It's unlikely that anyone named in the suit is planning to show up, so it's kind of a moot point anyway, but that lets WP cooperate with the court proceedings instead of maybe being shut down in one more jurisdiction, without endangering anyone as far as I can see. OP likes to pretend that this is something WP came up with on their own, instead of a court order they are fighting against, with the context that he feels they should be doing a better job of fighting the government of India on it when the courts of India are ordering them to do things.

[–] Fiivemacs@lemmy.ca 21 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I have never once been asked for personal information from Wikipedia...so as a whole, yes.

[–] WhatSay@slrpnk.net 9 points 20 hours ago