That the Xanatos gambit is what I now expect from all good villains. Any villain worth their salt has a way to defeat the hero โ even captured, killed, or frustrated.
Asklemmy
A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy ๐
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
- Open-ended question
- Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
- Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
- Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
- An actual topic of discussion
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
- Lemmyverse: community search
- sub.rehab: maps old subreddits to fediverse options, marks official as such
- !lemmy411@lemmy.ca: a community for finding communities
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
I always thought that entering, hot-wiring and driving away with a car was a complete fabrication, as cars have a steering column lock that prevents movement of the steering wheel. This scenario is often depeicted in older movies.
At least I thought so. I recently learned that this doesn't seem to be true, as there were cars around that do not have such locking mechanism. So this TV trope doesn't seem to be far fetched. I think it is a safety requirement now to combat car theft. I assume that modern, recent cars are locked electronically rather than mechanically.
However, I don't think that car manufacturers leave/left a conventient ammount of cable length underneath the steering column to be yanked out and to be hotwired in a comfortable and accessible way.
The image of "yank down on a panel under the steering wheel, a bunch of loose wires not in a loom or harness dangle out, two in the front are conveniently stripped and tinned. Touch these together to start the car." happens too often.
I check TV Tropes from time to time because it is useful to have a database with media tropes and to my experience it's mostly exhaustive.
But man, that site really irks me. I hate the overly casual, witty, irregular style that every page has while attempting to be funny, and I hate when they do incomplete hints at stuff (ex. "in some episode of show X" bruh, which episode??). For a wiki-style site, I'd really prefer the more neutral tone Wikipedia has.
And on a less important note, I also hate how the articles in TV Tropes pretend that the trope names are some sort of agreed consensus in the scientific community, when most of them are never referred to by those names outside of that site.
Iโd really prefer the more neutral tone Wikipedia has.
NPoV seems to be a really hard thing to keep.
I hate seeing people get into a fight, then one person throws the other person.
Back when I was an active user, I learned a lot of people only take in one piece of media and nothing else. I'm sure the site culture has shifted since then, but I remember a ton of entries exaggerating how extreme or unique basic tropes in My Little Pony: Friendship Is Magic are.
A lot of tropes were also constantly referred to as "anime tropes" and people suggested Japanese names for them when there was nothing about them that was unique to anime or Japanese culture.