this post was submitted on 24 Dec 2024
650 points (96.3% liked)

Technology

60091 readers
3233 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rottingleaf@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Intermediary platforms are like this, yes. They take place of what should be infrastructure.

I hope everybody understands that if some standard, easy to get into payment and catalogue system were in place, nobody would need these platforms. If you could pay to an IP address as easily as you can ping it. I mean, I think identities should be cryptographic in that, but you get the idea. It should be lower level functionality.

[–] Jeremyward@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Really hated when they started adding auto play of another unrelated podcast when my current podcast ends, like I don't want your shitty podcast selection Spotify. The enshitification of the web continues.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] 96VXb9ktTjFnRi@feddit.nl 46 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Pirate the music, use ListenBrainz (which is FOSS) to analyze your listening behavior and make recommendations

[–] nightlily@leminal.space 6 points 1 day ago (4 children)

So instead of the cents that artists get from streaming you propose they get nothing at all? You can buy from Bandcamp if the artists are on it and use ListenBrainz.

[–] frayedpickles@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 day ago

Exactly, they aren't losing anything and there's hope a better system will come along.

Agreed on Bandcamp though. The very few artists who use it get my money through there.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Can anyone tell me how to cancel Spotify service? I went to their website, but it wouldn't let me in without installing or logging into their app. And from their app I can't find a way to cancel!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Sakychu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 47 points 1 day ago (2 children)

"Our single best hope is a cooperative streaming platform owned by labels and musicians."

Oh yeah that worked great with movie and television streaming. I really like to pay the same price for just a tenth of the selection..

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I just use ViMusic or RiMusic or one of those types of forks. I believe it uses YouTube and other sources. It is ad-free and has the usual stuff you'd expect like suggestions, playlists, genres etc. Occasionally the source platform will make a change that breaks it, an update comes out fixes it.

That and there are still (probably ancient at this point) desktop clients that scrape your Pandora and download local copies of all the tracks. That's another good way to never listen to ads.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] crank0271@lemmy.world 247 points 1 day ago (26 children)

From the article:

"...journalist Liz Pelly has conducted an in-depth investigation, and published her findings in Harper’s—they are part of her forthcoming book Mood Machine: The Rise of Spotify and the Costs of the Perfect Playlist.

...

"Now she writes:

'What I uncovered was an elaborate internal program. Spotify, I discovered, not only has partnerships with a web of production companies, which, as one former employee put it, provide Spotify with “music we benefited from financially,” but also a team of employees working to seed these tracks on playlists across the platform. In doing so, they are effectively working to grow the percentage of total streams of music that is cheaper for the platform.'

In other words, Spotify has gone to war against musicians and record labels."

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 147 points 1 day ago (15 children)

Once they get maket shared they start extracting...

To normal people this is called enshitification

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (25 replies)
[–] Pregnenolone@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I have always been surprised that Spotify was so popular. I used them a while back and was abhorred with how shit the experience was. Stopped and never touched it again.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago

Once something gets critical mass and becomes "default," it doesn't even matter, people just use it and take it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 168 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I mean they paid Joe Rogan $100 million dollars so they have already wrecked their reputation.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 67 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Ngl, I canceled them and haven’t gone back since. Don’t really miss it much, I try to use the same cost as my subscription to buy music every month on CD when I can.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 64 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (5 children)

An obscure Swedish jazz musician got more plays than most of the tracks on Jon Batiste’s We Are—which had just won the Grammy for Album of the Year (not just the best jazz album, but the best album in any genre). How was that even possible?

LOL a couple obvious reasons are that Spotify listeners don't get to vote for grammy awards - only a few thousand people do - and to be eligible for a grammy an album has to be released in the United States. The awards are more heavily influenced by album sales than subjective judgements of musical quality. Jimi Hendrix never won a grammy. Neither did Bob Marley or Diana Ross. There's a lot already wrong with the grammys.

The fake musicians and possibly AI-generated songs are more interesting. If the music industry is trying to eliminate musicians it wouldn't be to avoid paying them - they've already figured out lots of ways to do that - it would be to have complete control over the music.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] dinckelman@lemmy.world 101 points 1 day ago (3 children)

There's a reason why artists have to sell 50$ t-shirts at shows. Back in the days, the label would leech you dry, and now it's Spotify, on top of your label

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] shoulderoforion@fedia.io 92 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The last and only truth I needed to know about Spotify was it's 250 million dollar deal with Joe Rogan, who is antivax incel cancer, and that was it for me. No need to learn or know any more about them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mattd@programming.dev 41 points 1 day ago (2 children)

When some employees expressed concerns about this, Spotify managers replied (according to Pelly’s sources) that “listeners wouldn’t know the difference.”

Insulting your users, that always works out so well

[–] JoshuaFalken@lemmy.world 1 points 17 hours ago

I'm all aboard Spotify alternatives, but this post is an echo chamber of people that are far more likely to know "the difference". We aren't representative of Spotify's customer base.

Most people listening to music probably wouldn't be able tell the difference from cutting the quality down by double digit percentages. This is exemplified by the number of people using wireless headphones.

Spotify certainly could offer service on par with Tidal and similar, but being beholden to shareholders that only look at the bottom line and never the quality of the service, that executive might not be right, but they're not exactly wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] datendefekt@feddit.org 40 points 1 day ago (3 children)

After comparing the sound quality of Amazon, Spotify, Deezer and Tidal, the dynamic range of Tidal really stood out - even in lowest quality. At that time, I read that Tidal had the highest payout to the artists. I also like that the service is partially owned by several artists.

The recommendations and feeds are really top notch, just the right mix of stuff I know and like and nice surprises. The "Daily Discovery" often explores a certain genre or mood. There are so many cool bands I've found - also from genres I don't usually listen to. I can wholeheartedly recommend the service.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›