this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2024
33 points (100.0% liked)

United Kingdom

4137 readers
132 users here now

General community for news/discussion in the UK.

Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.

Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OrlandoDoom@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hiding that racial slurs exist isn't a way to stop racism.

After reading the article, I still think these books are important, but it made it seem they were reading these books out in the class like we did with harry potter and stuff.

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I'd say these books are important for anyone studying American literature - and probably essential for anyone studying American literature of the 20th Century.

They're not so important for Welsh pupils and don't need to be included in a general English literature syllabus for 15-year-olds in the UK. The reasoning outlined in the article for choosing not to include these sorts of works in the list of required and optional texts for this specific qualification is pretty convincing IMO and I completely support it.

No books are being banned from schools or anything like that. The article headline is I suspect just trying to get clicks from the anti-woke crowd.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 29 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Another failure of anyone with any kind of responsibility to have a spine

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 31 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

The book is explicitly anti racist. It's depicting racism in a negative light. It's pretty progressive for something written in the '30s if anything.

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 12 points 4 days ago (2 children)

What will we do with all the copies of the books already in schools?

The English teachers will have to take them out the back and shoot them.

[–] MouldyCat@feddit.uk 3 points 2 days ago

The book hasn't been banned, it's just not been selected as a required or optional text in a new English qualification for Welsh schools. Steinbeck is a wonderful author and story-teller, and his stories provide a useful insight into America's difficult recent past in regards to racial segregation (as well as other issues such as oppression of the poor). America is an important country, and it's useful to understand why it remains such a damaged society with deep racial divides even today, but it's not Wales is it.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 9 points 4 days ago

"tend the rabbits"