this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024
83 points (97.7% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5393 readers
261 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 31 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Further proof he doesn't even know what the word means

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 6 points 5 days ago

I'd be surprised if he could spell his own name at this point.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

The EU is capable of resisting Trump pretty well. However many countries are not. That is honesty the real problem here.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 10 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Short term, the countries that can’t say no, will say yes. However, they will seek alternative markets for purchase and sale. It damages the relationship for short term gain, all paid by the business and American consumer.

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Fuck Trump and the horse he rode in on (Musk), but he is doing wonders for UK/EU relations.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Lol, he's part of the cabal that pushed for Brexit. One step forward in reaction to two steps back is not to his credit.

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Obviously nothing is to their credit. But the talk about tariffs is forcing the UK to look towards Europe more than they maybe would have, and a majority of Brexit voters are now in favour of joining the EU's internal market.

It was just a tongue in cheek way of saying that the US' only ally in the world is going to be the soaring Russian economy - even the Brits, who forcefully tied themself to the Mayflower mast, are now looking back to Europe.

In good personal news, a good friend of mine in the UK has landed a really good job in the UK working on the tariffs. I'm very happy for her. Silver linings. :)

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The chart linked to the "soaring Russian economy" link shows the Ruble exchange rate, which says very little about the state of the overall Russian economy, except foreign exchange. And that exchange-rate chart shows the value of the Ruble doing down the shitter.

So I'm guessing you were being sarcastic.

[–] aasatru@kbin.earth 2 points 3 days ago

Yes, I was being sarcastic. A strong currency is generally associated with a strong economy. The Russians managed to keep the ruble strong the first year of the war, somewhat stable in the second. The last three months have been rather turbulent.

It of course affects the Russian man in the street directly, foreign goods (whatever is still imported) get more expensive. It could be beneficial for exports, but it seems their energy business is not going so great either.

So yeah, I was indeed being sarcastic. As long as they have energy to export they will have some income, but it has been a long time since the Russian economy looked worse.

That's my analysis though. According to a coughing, cold sweating Putin, all is going just great.

Whether it's me or Putin who are correct on this one, a weak ruble to the dollar means Russians will struggle to afford imported goods from the US. So they are not going to be a very profitable trade partner any time soon.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago

If it's in their national interests, they'll cheat. Why comply in good faith when you're being coerced?

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 4 points 4 days ago

and long term the higher oil and gas consumption is going to damage the climate even worse...

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 21 points 5 days ago (2 children)
[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 40 points 5 days ago
[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago (2 children)

This is the most Putin sounding shit I ever read

[–] theonlytruescotsman@sh.itjust.works 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

American does generic American thing: "this is just like the foreign bad guys in my TV show!"

[–] sexy_peach@feddit.org 1 points 5 days ago

It's just a bad move and stupid threat. I don't want Russian oil and gas...

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 days ago

von der Leyen's sycophancy is the most worrying part of the article, even as individual EU countries, German minister quote, suggests resistance.

EU already signed significant O&G long term contracts after Ukraine war. Even as they are reducing NG and coal electricity by 10% this year, and on path for another 10% every next year, longer term supply lock ins is certain to slow that progress in addition to promoting more global/US development.