this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2023
398 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37699 readers
482 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

We'll soon be implementing some changes in our effort to reduce spam in Direct Messages. Unverified accounts will have daily limits on the number of DMs they can send. Subscribe today to send more messages

https://twitter.com/TwitterSupport/status/1682501248334061572

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mojo@lemm.ee 107 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is an awesome thing, it encourages people up get off their site

[–] millionsofplayers@lemmy.one 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Twitter could implement a feature where you could only read like 25 tweets a week and Twitter would still somehow survive

[–] Little8Lost@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago

But then likely only the musk fanbase and maybe a few confused are the only left

[–] prole@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago

I think you're giving "normal people" way too much credit.

[–] FoxBJK@midwest.social 68 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, it’s “to fight spam” and not at all an attempt to cut costs of the free users.

Just keep squeezing Elon. Blood will come out of that stone soon enough I just know it!!

[–] TheHalc@sopuli.xyz 42 points 1 year ago

This won't do anything to cut any costs.

This is all about enshittifying the free experience to push those on the edge to finally bite the bullet and start paying.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kinda pointless when most of the spam I encounter in general is from verified accounts. Love that doucheblock extension, and Blue Blocker for automuting accounts that promote tweets.

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago

well I just checked the twitter replies and am now adding “sugar daddy”, “sugar momma” and “sugar baby” to doucheblock. They can’t even handle spam replies to the support account.

[–] Plume@beehaw.org 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I remember the conspiracy theory that was going on in the right wing circles of the internet a few years ago, where people like Tim Pool were saying that the blue checkmark was an attempt from Twitter to create a "privileged class on Twitter"...

All of those people are the ones that Elon's been pandering so hard to and look at Twitter now.

Why is it with these people, that them who cry wolf so often, also turns out to be the wolves so often?

[–] Uno@monyet.cc 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

It seems crazy that Twitter is actively taking steps to become a worse social media company. Back when I was a kid, companies were supposed to be these well thought out, highly methodical entities that would only make the most optimal moves. I suppose it's 2023 now though.

[–] LittlePrimate@feddit.de 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Look up enshittitication, it's an interesting rabbit hole.

Basically, the idea is that there is a path companies go along where they first please users to build a user base, once you are bound to a platform and don't want to leave (because "everyone" is there) they instead start to shift towards pleasing advertisers until they also feel trapped (because "everyone" advertises there). The final move is trying to squeeze as much as possible out of all these trapped people and companies. It's not just social media, although this of course makes it most obvious at least for a trapped user base. But this also applies for any other big thing that "evryone" uses.

[–] prole@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

"Enshittification" isn't a rabbit hole, it's a term made up by a pretty hacky young adult sci-fi author like a few months ago for behavior that has been happening and documented in capitalism for at least a century.

[–] LittlePrimate@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Putting a name on a century-old concept isn't the worst idea because now we can easily refer to it when it happens once again. And yes, the old age of that problem is why I consider it a bit of a rabit-hole. It's not just something Twitter does now or that tech companies do now because they copy from each other. It's a quite old concept you'll hear about again and again and can read up on quite a bit, if you really are interested into more than the basic concept or why companies keep trying even though the outcome does not always see positive (from an outside, users perspective).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That sci-fi author is 52 "young" already, has spent like 25 years writing and active about the evolution of the Internet and how it impacts personal rights, so I'd give him the right to coin a new term for an old concept.

It doesn't prevent anyone from calling it:

  • "Attract, Fidelize, Monetize"
  • "Entice, Entrap, Exploit"
  • "Capture, Enslave, Squeeze"

...or whatever other set of words doesn't elicit a negative connotation in the business world at the particular moment in time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Mars@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This looks more like trining to make it run in a stolen raspberry pi in Elon’s basement than trining to extract value.

Let’s be real, there is no value left to extract.

[–] LittlePrimate@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I didn't want to say that Twitters execution of it is perfect, it's just why Elon comes up with all these seemingly insane ideas. He has a huge userbase that won't leave, he had advertisers who he thought wouldn't want to leave and now he's trying to squeeze. The problem is that he obviously didn't have his grasp as tightly around the advertisers as he thought, which is why step 3 of Enshittitication entirely fails, at least from what is known to us. The idea is to keep everyone kind of hostage while you squeeze and while it seems to work with a huge chunk of the userbase, a bigger portion of the advertisers simply move on.

[–] Mars@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

It’s not that huge of a userbase. Pinterest is bigger. Twitter just have a disproportionate amount of celebrities, politicians and journalists addicted to the instant feedback and drama.

Elon is hooked and high on his own supply, so he seems incapable of understand what Twitter actually IS for most users and that “ego boosting machine for the rich and famous” is not a business plan.

Enshitification implies a degree of planning and success that he seems incapable of right now. And you can’t jump to step three without achieving steps one and two. Never good for (most of) the users, never good for the advertisers. Nothing to squeeze.

I mean, it has gone to shit, but it doesn’t seem intentional. Even in the best of circumstances these changes would not be better for the bottom line than just doing nothing.

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago

Even more interesting is that Reddit is taking a look at it and saying huh that looks good I'll have the same thing

[–] Proweruser@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Dude, that was never a thing. Companies are run by humans. Humans are dumb.

[–] nightdice@feddit.de 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, because spammers clearly can't afford 8 bucks a month

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 12 points 1 year ago

Spammers definitely can't afford creating 1000 accounts and paying 0 bucks a month... /s

[–] wildeaboutoskar@beehaw.org 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This will have an impact on journalists who use Twitter to get tips for reporting. Seen some who were concerned this would happen

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also many companies provide tech support via Twitter (e.g. PayPal).
I also wanted to add that ZSSK (Slovakian state-owned passenger train company) uses Twitter for reporting extraordinary events like trains being very late, cancelled, alternative bus transport (which can be pretty important as buses can't always get to each station), etc., but checking zssk.sk I noticed they switched from Twitter to Mastodon after these recent events.

[–] Mars@beehaw.org 19 points 1 year ago

I had a problem with my family account on Spotify and my options for asking for support were twitter dms or some meta stuff (Facebook dms?)

I was 🤏🏻 this close to cancel my account right there, but my partner still has social media accounts, so they solved it in my name.

Get a freaking email inbox…

[–] Little8Lost@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Good thing they switched, want others to follow. From what i got especcially people in eurobean countries are hopping on mastodon

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm more concerned with "journalists who use Twitter to get tips for reporting".

Like, isn't a journalist supposed to contrast and verify information? Not just spin some random tips from Twitter?

[–] hamiltonicity@beehaw.org 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A tip isn't a story in itself, it's a suggestion of where to start looking for one. "Hey, I'm off the record here, but some shady shit is going down at my job and you might want to fire off a Freedom of Information request for x, y and z or talk to a and b" is a pretty good tip.

[–] jarfil@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Guess you're right, I just find it weird for anyone to leave a worthwhile tip over an unencrypted third party company's messaging. It's like "I'm off the record... but I don't really care who hears me say it".

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 year ago

"in our effort to reduce spam"

... Sure... That's the reason.....

[–] bentsea@lemmy.mrm.one 25 points 1 year ago

More ideas for Spez to use on Reddit.

[–] reclipse@lemdro.id 22 points 1 year ago

I like how social media companies are starting to embrace the Fediverse.

[–] MadeFreshDaily@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

Does anyone even use Twitter for anything other than dumb ass politics and seeing free nudes of their favorite e-thot anymore? I don’t think I’ve seen anything entertaining on there in years.

[–] straycat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Many absolutely cracked artists post on Twitter and nowhere else, that's the only reason I've ever used it.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

I post my photos there because I reach a significantly wider audience on twitter than instagram. Zero politics on my feed

[–] mateomaui@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago

I have a list on there with National Geographic and other accounts that only post interesting things, barely any political stuff. Space and other photography. Trolls don’t appear much there.

Probably the only reason I still open it now and then.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] throws_lemy@lemmy.nz 13 points 1 year ago

Well, it's time for their users to consider moving to mastodon / fediverse

[–] Peter1986C@beehaw.org 10 points 1 year ago

Oh no! Anyway...

[–] Proweruser@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago

Somebody is getting real desperate over there.

[–] yaycupcake@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 year ago

Yeah that's super fucked up. Who the hell thinks this shit is a good idea. I'm so tired.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's the limit? As long as it's high I can see this as decent anti spam idea.

[–] loobkoob@kbin.social 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It'd make for a good anti-spam measure if there was a limit to the number of DMs users could send to other people who don't follow them back. It'd mean people can still use Twitter DMs like a normal messaging service (which isn't something I care for, but I know some people use it like that).

As it is, it just feels similar to the whole "rate limiting the number of tweets people can view per day" thing, where they're taking the most obvious route to reducing bandwidth usage by restricting users.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Probably whatever number Elon arbitrarily decides he thinks maximizes the conversion rate to premium.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

In that case, it'll definitely be 69 for new accounts and 420 for established accounts. He's predictable.

[–] Thorny_Thicket@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago

Agreed. Most private messages I get are from fake accounts that probably spam the same message to hundreds of other users aswell.

[–] matricaria@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

At this point, who even cares? Are there still people on Twitter? Just move on and use something else.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] forcide@lemmit.xyz 7 points 1 year ago

Nice, putting existing features behind paywalls..

load more comments
view more: next ›