this post was submitted on 04 Dec 2024
57 points (96.7% liked)

Linux

48920 readers
689 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not sure why that is, but I have 32 GB of RAM and I would like my system to utilize it as much as possible, but as you can see in the screenshot, the system is only using 5.66 GB of the physical RAM, but swap is still being used in a high number. Is this normal? Should I lower the swappiness to lower than 10? Should I let it be? Thanks
Here is the screenshot

(page 2) 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedWeasel@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

You probably just had a program(s) use a lot of ram and that pushed some processes to swap. When the system needs it, it will be moved back. I’d +1 on setting up zram. Can be setup easily on most distros.

[–] flashgnash@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That looks a lot like task manager, what tool is that?

[–] penquin@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Mission center. It's a gnome app. I used KDE plasma, but prefer this app over the plasma one.

[–] grehund@beehaw.org 1 points 1 month ago
[–] merthyr1831@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago
[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago (5 children)

swap is usually significantly slower than ram; are you certain that you wan to use that instead?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›