this post was submitted on 18 Mar 2022
72 points (90.9% liked)

Programmer Humor

32063 readers
912 users here now

Post funny things about programming here! (Or just rant about your favourite programming language.)

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SavvyWolf@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I will say, as I've grown older and more jaded, I've been finding the GPL more and more appealing...

Edit: Oh wow, why did a year old post show up at the top of "Hot", sorry about bumping.

[–] sedawk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

IDK but I agree with you about the GPL

[–] AppearanceBoring9229@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If someone steals a GPL project what can be done to demonstrate that it's stolen and not just very similar but their own creation?

[–] sedawk@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Often when binaries are decompiled specific internal structures and code can be exposed and that can be used for comparison to source code to make an argument in court. Thats established case law already.

Either way it involves the person's with the GPL copy right taking a company to court. IE openwrt comes from linksys taking the Linux kernel and BusyBox source. Both are GPL.

[–] cheer@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

MIT is great for tiny scripts and the like, but any large project should be copyleft imo.

[–] Amicchan@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago

I agree; I fear that companies will screw over a permissively licensed project.

I think FOSS Game Engines should be copyleft.


How could companies screw over MIT-licensed projects though?

[–] onlymemes@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago

Cuck license

[–] Lucien@hexbear.net 1 points 8 months ago

Same goes for BSD, Apache, etc

load more comments
view more: next ›