this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2023
2124 points (99.3% liked)

Privacy

32130 readers
1214 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

And since you won't be able to modify web pages, it will also mean the end of customization, either for looks (ie. DarkReader, Stylus), conveniance (ie. Tampermonkey) or accessibility.

The community feedback is... interesting to say the least.

(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] guy@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is just terrible.

However, while it does add a layer of annoyance that'll mess things up for most, like any DRM, it fundamentally is unsound and will get cracked. Us good people have a big incentive to do so here. Reading the spec, it still relies on a trusted party (expected to be the OS) and, unlike ie. games consoles, we already have admin access to that party from the get go.

Where it could be a problem is mobile phones. They could target browsers that support ad blocking and you'd probably need to root the phone to get past that.

[–] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Definitely time to make our own internet, with hookers and blow.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] arc@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I find it hard to see how they could protect content from ad blockers without also crippling pages that self modify their own content. Perhaps they could put headers akin to content security policy that forbids external modification. Assuming a browser were to honour that header I could see bad publicity and a lot of people just moving to another browser which doesn't. Additionally, ad blockers aren't the only things that modify pages - breaking accessibility add ons could be more negative publicity (just like with Reddit).

I think browsers would be best off to let websites develop countermeasures if they're so sore about ad blockers. Perhaps they could use "self healing" Javascript libraries that put back content which is removed. Or they could just refuse to work if they detect an ad blocker, e.g. they stick some canaries in the DOM or along blocked paths to see if an ad blocker is present.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PeterPoopshit@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We should harass the fuck out of this guy until he removes it. This shit is completely uncalled for.

[–] Star@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I ditched Chrome about a year ago for Edge and just recently switched to Firefox, shouldn't really be concerning as long as there are alternatives.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] doge_d_aspin@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Greed kills everything good

[–] Zeth0s@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Is these a real google plan, or just an engineer proposal on github?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] diffuselight@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This has to be seen in context of AI - Google will offer this to companies to ‘protect their pages from being scraped’

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] perestroika@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

If they overcome / disable ad blocking, they will lose browser market share - and people don't design websites for marginal browsers with exotic features.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lohrun@fediverse.boo 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Web 3.0 - users, kindly go fuck yourselves p.s. pay us subscription money and view lots of ads

[–] makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

I feel like lemmy is the real Web 3. I'll die on that little hill gladly

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›