this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
55 points (96.6% liked)

Firefox

17907 readers
140 users here now

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Bloated and complacent, Chrome might be on the path to playing the same role as IE was playing 15 years ago, shunned by developers and technologically inferior to other browsers.

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NuraShiny@hexbear.net 3 points 1 hour ago

Please. All of chromium is bad and should die.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 42 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

At the moment though, there is no single likely alternative to Chrome’s dominance. But perhaps that’s for the better.

First off, why is it for the better not having no alternative? Secondly Firefox IS an alternative to Chrome.

BTW, this Magic Lasso is an ad blocker for Safari.

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

I'm hoping this bit is what they meant

Maybe a collection of browsers, all supporting open web standards, with substantial, though not dominant marketshare is the answer.

Instead of having chrome replaced by some other browser and the cycle repeating, the author might want a fair balance of different browsers eating away at their market share?

I will still recommend Firefox to regular users, and Zen for users that want something new/different (Arc users for example)

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Maybe they really was comparing the dominance position only, not being a usable alternative. Although Firefox does not work for everything and Chrome or other browsers are required instead (such as streaming with Xbox games in browser), so there is that. If we only speak about market dominance and the ability to change that, yes, then I agree that Firefox/Mozilla is not in a position to do that at the moment.

Firefox should be used alone for the fact that it has superior addon support for ad blockers. That's a real world difference and reason, not just some ideology (as it was it in the past for me).

[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 hours ago

Firefox should be used alone for the fact that it has superior addon support for ad blockers. That’s a real world difference and reason, not just some ideology (as it was it in the past for me).

Agreed! Up till now, it was on par with chrome for functionality / user experience. Moving forward it will be better because it will still have proper ad-blockers

[–] ruk_n_rul@monyet.cc 27 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

People are only realizing this today?

[–] isgleas@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 hours ago

Definitely a la IE

[–] Dirk@lemmy.ml 11 points 5 hours ago

Technologically inferior to other browsers? What other browsers? Firefox?

[–] thoralf@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Kinda fitting that Microsoft chose Chrome as the base for its Edge browser …

[–] shath@hexbear.net 2 points 36 minutes ago

the reverse midas touch

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 1 points 5 hours ago

Tomorrow a new block post: Magic Lasso suggests that Google might be the new AltaVista