this post was submitted on 17 Nov 2024
340 points (96.4% liked)

politics

19107 readers
5277 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

President Biden became the first sitting U.S. president to visit the Amazon rainforest, emphasizing the global urgency of combating climate change.

During his historic visit, he called protecting the environment “a fight for humanity, citing achievements such as rejoining the Paris Agreement, boosting climate financing to $11 billion annually, and advancing green energy through the Inflation Reduction Act

He announced new conservation efforts, including $50 million for the Amazon Fund, and declared Nov. 17 as International Conservation Day.

Biden urged leaders to prioritize both environmental protection and economic growth, leaving a climate-focused legacy amid concerns over President-elect Trump’s rollback plans.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 1 points 10 minutes ago

There won’t be anyone left to read the history.

[–] kreskin@lemmy.world 2 points 30 minutes ago

Lets see him be the first president to drink the water in an area where fracking has permanently destroyed the groundwater with forever chemicals.

Who cares if he visits a rainforest. Thats utterly meaningless.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Lol.

We just voted against addressing climate change and, in fact, for making it worse.

Humans are going to destroy this planet. That is indisputable. The only question is if we'll have the means to leave for another one before it's too late.

[–] telllos@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

To go where? If we can fix another planet, we can fix our own. If we can reach another planet, probably we could fix our planet. But we cant, because of money.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

If we can fix another planet, we can fix our own.

Who said we're fixing another planet? If we're lucky, we'll be able to move to another one and destroy that one, then move on from there.

probably we could fix our planet. But we cant, because of money.

It's not just money. We are inherently destructive. Our "big" brains make it so we can never be 100% compatible with our natural world the way animals are. We will ALWAYS produce waste. Right now the amount of waste we produce is obscene and entirely unstustainable. The best you can hope for is a future where education and technology allow us to produce far less waste. But we will always produce waste. We will never achieve 100% recycling capabilities. We will absolutely either destroy this planet via pollution or by using up all its available resources. We've made countless species go extinct and are continuing to do so. We are a virus on the face of the universe.

Our destiny is to either migrate (spread) to other planets or go extinct. That is the curse of sentience.

[–] Cyteseer@lemmy.world 1 points 44 minutes ago

How misanthropic. Humans aren't intrinsically anything, we are what we allow ourselves to be. And pragmatically, we absolutely don't have the resources to spread to other planets but we do have the resources to improve our own, no matter how far gone it seems.

[–] tee9000@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

History is watching you fly a military escort to the amazon and back for a photo op you dip

[–] Absaroka@lemmy.world 20 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Not for nothing, but waiting until the waning days and weeks of your presidency to take a trip to the Amazon and say this feels a little ... lackluster.

And exactly the kind of thing people are grilling the Democrats for after the election. Biden should have been saying this in his first year, not the 11th hour.

[–] ssladam@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Exactly. Maybe someone could have mentioned this during election season if it was so important?

[–] bitwolf@lemmy.one 6 points 7 hours ago

Will miss you Biden. I saw the policies youve tried and how hard you were filibusted on climate policies.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 33 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

It was watching you for the last 4 years, Joe.

[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 9 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (3 children)

He did a lot. The IRA law got a ton of green investments and enterprises going, including attracting businesses from across the globe. But that's all gone now with Trump.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago

Yup.

Americans are too lazy and dumb to pay attention. The majority thought Biden sucked and didn't accomplish anything. Couldn't be further from the truth.

We're a society of irresponsible voters and the decline we're about to experience is no one's fault but our own.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

Yet another handout to car dependency grifters. Nothing green about that.

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 7 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

You don't have to carry water for him anymore. He's not running.

Biden bragged about record oil production. Bragged.

[–] hark@lemmy.world 29 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Wasn't this the administration bragging about approving a record number of fracking permits?

[–] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 0 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Because we are at war with Russia and Iran and they won't sell us oil and we still need oil for society to function

[–] hark@lemmy.world 9 points 9 hours ago (2 children)

The US is a net exporter of oil and the country that we import most of our oil from is Canada: https://www.eia.gov/tools/faqs/faq.php?id=727&t=6

Iran has been a constant for decades, so that isn't a factor. While Russia has been sanctioned, their oil is still being bought up at a steep discount by India and China, so those countries' demand for oil from other sources are reduced and the impact to the oil markets are likely insignificant overall.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 41 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 22 hours ago) (1 children)

This was so important to me that I decided to only do it a month before I'm leaving.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 130 points 1 day ago (20 children)

History will not judge him kindly. He oversaw a hiatus on his country's march to fascism but ultimately chose upholding the status quo over real change that would actually have stopped it

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Gointhefridge@lemm.ee 63 points 1 day ago

Oh NOW history is watching! Hasn’t been watching for the last 4 years at all it seems but I guess history took a little break.

load more comments
view more: next ›