this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
219 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59373 readers
3394 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ikidd@lemmy.world 6 points 10 hours ago

Maybe crowdsource hitmen.

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 82 points 20 hours ago

Tldr, to help fight patent trolls:

They're asking you to find evidence of preexisting technology -- referred to by patent lawyers as "prior art" -- that can kill off bad patents. This could be open-source documentation (including release notes), published standards or specifications, product manuals, articles, blogs, books, or any publicly available information.

They use this info to essentially undercut and invalidate the patent trolls' filing, killing their ability to file suit on that patent again.

There's also a contest with a $3000 prize for anyone who can help kill a current one on their plate.

https://patroll.unifiedpatents.com/contests/s3vQkRdTC6coNkjyx

[–] RobotToaster@mander.xyz 43 points 19 hours ago

Another way to help: If you have an idea that someone could possibly patent, no matter how stupid you think it is, you can publish a defensive technical disclosure on tdcommons for free https://www.tdcommons.org/

[–] JoYo@lemmy.ml 12 points 16 hours ago

if you are known to look at patents then you become a target of patent trolls.

i advise good OPSEC.

[–] canadaduane@lemmy.ca 4 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I love this approach.

Nit: "If you can find prior art that describes such a system before June 13, 2013, you could be a winner." ... 2013 is a typo I'm guessing?

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 13 points 12 hours ago

That’s not the submission deadline, that’s the priority date for this particular patent, basically when it was first filed. If people can find other published information describing what the patent covers that predates the filing it would help invalidate the patent.

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 13 points 19 hours ago

Imagine a society where people who generate value have to waste their energy fighting these shit stains.

Congress wont do their jobs lol

[–] AbidanYre@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago