this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2024
1430 points (99.2% liked)

Science Memes

11036 readers
5584 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] mac@lemm.ee 13 points 8 hours ago

The appointment of Elon Musk to lead the proposed department of government efficiency raises concerns, given his track record of business management.

His handling of Twitter/X after its $44 billion acquisition has resulted in a significant decline in its value, with some sources putting the valuation around $9bn.

Doesn't seem very efficient to me.

[–] rational_lib@lemmy.world 117 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

The world just keeps getting more and more efficient at being dumb. Let's just count all the appallingly stupid things crammed into this small meme with 2 million views:

  1. "Insurrection Barbie"
  2. Celebrating the defunding of useful scientific research by a new government efficiency agency
  3. This new agency is named after a cryptocurrency
  4. The cryptocurrency in question was created as a joke to satirize cryptocurrencies, but became a top prominent cryptocurrency itself.
  5. The "Department of Government Efficiency Agency" has 2 heads, both of whom have other primary jobs and were chosen in return for political support.
  6. There is also already an existing government agency that does the exact same thing, called the "Government Accountability Office". But most people seem to be unaware of it, likely because it's not named after a cryptocurrency/dog meme.
  7. This whole scheme was the idea of the richest person in the world.

Idiocracy didn't happen because of unnatural selection, it happened because social media unlocked a runaway chain reaction of stupidity.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 13 points 16 hours ago (5 children)

Why are people saying that it was named after a cryptocurrency?

Isnt the dog the first thing people think of when seeing "doge"?

[–] sleeperdouge@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 hours ago

It was for me until a few years ago. I used doge as a base for most of my internet alias since I like the meme (as you can see from my username). One time inside a game, I was asked if I was a crypto bro because of my ign. At the time, i don't like crypto but have no hard feelings against it. Ever since then I loath those crypto bros and their worship of crypto currencies for destroying the image of doge and with their stupid crypto currency nonsense.

[–] antonim@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 9 hours ago

Isnt the dog the first thing people think of when seeing “doge”?

It used to be so, but in recent several years Doge has lived and pretty much been defined in public consciousness by the cryptocurrency, which Musk has openly endorsed/memed.

[–] TassieTosser@aussie.zone 7 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Is it better to be named after a stupid meme instead?

[–] zagaberoo@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 hours ago

Yes, Kabosu was a gem.

[–] zeca@lemmy.eco.br 46 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Its reasonable to make the connection to the coin, as this particular cryptocurrency was propagandized and manipulated by musk, who will be running the agency.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 16 points 16 hours ago

True! It was then technically named after a meme...which the coin named itself after, as it was supposed to be a "meme coin".

Still stands though.

"Government agency named after meme. Such dumb. So chaos. Woooooow." Lol

[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 36 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (3 children)

China is going to devour the scientific world if we keep it like this

[–] ShimmeringKoi@hexbear.net 5 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] pH3ra@lemmy.ml 2 points 4 hours ago

A scientific monopoly is a bad thing regardless who you cheer for

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 10 points 12 hours ago

Won't happen, or at least won't be useful if it does. Lotta Chinese authors are faking data for the sake of the CCP and their studies don't replicate. If that takes over, it'll be like a global Dark Age.

[–] TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com 7 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (1 children)

Going to continue devouring the scientific world with lots of smart Westerners leaving the new SlaveTastic^tm^ USA

[–] Zementid@feddit.nl 6 points 12 hours ago

Republicans deserve no progress. Let them fall back into the ages they desire. No Smartphones. That's which science.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 109 points 19 hours ago (16 children)

Say it with me:

No. Research. Is. Useless.

If we say that research is useless because it doesn't bring you mo ey we could stop teaching children math beyond the absolute basics because "it doesn't brinf them anything". This is stupid, because those are the fundamentals that tech children to thing logically and become useful member of society. Same with research. It teaches us the things necessary to maybe invent some of the most useful stuff ever seen

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 69 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Republicans: "No. Research is useless."

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] Ethalis@jlai.lu 288 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Sure, that's great but it's not even the point. Fundamental research and other type of "useless" scientific endeavors help humanity as a whole to better understand our universe but would never be privately funded because they don't have any concrete and immediate financial benefits. This is precisely what a government should finance, because no one else would do it and yet it's small stuff like that that make us collectively move forward as a species

[–] bronzle@lemm.ee 1 points 47 minutes ago

Oh, they’ll probably publicly fund it for private profit

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 81 points 20 hours ago (6 children)

Musk fans don't want humanity to advance. They hate technological progress.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 29 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Neolib idiots don't see the (immense) value of fundamental research because it doesn't directly generate profits, more at 11

[–] ReCursing@lemmings.world 8 points 11 hours ago

They're not neolibs, they're fascists. The Democrats are neolibs

[–] fsxylo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Which is stupid, because even video games make you research sticks before you can make nuclear reactors. Guess even entertainment can't teach dumb shits anything. Just retaining nothing.

[–] Famko@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

They've never seen a game complicated enough to have research tbf.

[–] djsoren19@yiffit.net 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It directly generates profits, they're just too stupid to understand how.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.world 5 points 11 hours ago

Yeah but sometimes it might not because that is not the main goal ! Useless, I tell you !

[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 103 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

"preventing next corn plague" with resources used being a box of soil and bunch of underpaid grads seems pretty efficient to me, but i guess that since the common clay of the new west already voted they can be safely disposed of

at USDA, they're turning beetles kinky! 😡

  • alex jones fuming aimlessly while being stored in some container
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PanArab@lemm.ee 19 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Welcome to a new era of weaponized ignorance

[–] Hobbes_Dent@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Galileo wept

[–] GreatTitEnthusiast@mander.xyz 129 points 21 hours ago (34 children)

In addition, government research in the sciences is miniscule. You could cut ALL of science funding and be no where close to the 1 trillion that Musk claims he'll be able to reduce the budget by

load more comments (34 replies)
[–] Randelung@lemmy.world 32 points 18 hours ago (4 children)

Like the dead don't realize they're dead, they don't realize they're stupid. They're just everyone else's problem.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 112 points 22 hours ago (4 children)

And so the US lost decade becomes the medieval dark ages

It'd be fascinating as an outsider if the choices made by the US didn't basically impact everything, everywhere.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Facebones@reddthat.com 27 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

Welcome to the new Dark Ages, brought to you by religious fascists.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Darth_Reagan@hexbear.net 21 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

the 2010s science bazinga man being the reason all the cool science gets cut is darkly funny.

load more comments
view more: next ›