this post was submitted on 19 Jul 2023
27 points (100.0% liked)

Socialism

2822 readers
11 users here now

Beehaw's community for socialists, communists, anarchists, and non-authoritarian leftists (this means anti-capitalists) of all stripes. A place for all leftist and labor news and discussion, as long as you're nice about it.


Non-socialists are welcome to come to learn, though it's hard to get to in-depth discussions if the community is constantly fighting over the basics. We ask that non-socialists please be respectful and try not to turn this into a "left vs right" debate forum by asking leading questions or by trying to draw others into a fight.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rentlar@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Insurance companies are in the business of making money by NOT helping people enough when they need it. It seems so counterproductive...

[–] TheTrueLinuxDev@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It would make more sense if community just set up contracts amongst themselves to pool together with monthly community fund added to the pile and if something happened, then a clause in the contact begins and facilitate the steps to release fund for that person. Contract could set up arbiter (paid hourly) to determine whether the claim is covered by the contract agreed by the subscribers.

The major difference in this model is basically that the perverse incentive is removed whereas commercial insurance have every incentives not to pay out to claimants which defeats the purpose of insurance in the first place.

I don't know much about insurance laws or contracting to say for sure, but part of me is wondering why we haven't popularize this idea yet.

[–] Rentlar@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago

Mutual insurance is closer to this setup. Policy holders are the main shareholders of the company. Issue is that most policy holders won't be able to insure each other in Florida if most habitable areas of Florida will be underwater by 2050.

[–] shanghaibebop@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Still can’t provide a solid service because these days you need to have re-insurance when single Florida Hurricane or California fire will cause several billion dollars of damage.

Assuming every single Florida person paid into a mandatory Mutual insurance pool.

Given 10m house units in Florida, hurricane Ian alone did 100 billion dollars of damage. That’s 10k per house of damage. Of course that’s not all residential house damage, but only 1 hurricane. that just gives you a rough scale of how insurance just won’t work in Florida no matter what in the face of climate change.

[–] ammorok@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

Just so they can turn right back around and inundate us with nonsensical advertising