this post was submitted on 08 Nov 2024
51 points (82.3% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4031 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] superkret@feddit.org 83 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Can we just stop using the word "economy" for the income of the billionaire class?

[–] dtrain@lemmy.world 57 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

This article is spot on. Saying the economy is booming when it’s only benefiting the small fractionthose who have the money to buy into it, leaves a good chunk of the population frustrated and wanting a huge change.

[–] ceiphas@lemmy.world 62 points 5 days ago (3 children)

And the change with trump is "get the billionaires some more billions, lol"

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 32 points 5 days ago (2 children)

America is full of idiots. So yes they might not get it but they probably do think trump will do something good. Or they just want worse for the minority. Idk i dont understand all this either.

[–] 0000011110110111i@lemm.ee 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Or they just want worse for the minority.

The truth that most people know, but don’t want to say out loud.

[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago (2 children)

As a disappointed American, you are so right. Im sorry for not voting even if i think it wouldn’t have mattered, if all non voters stood up and voted we could have turned the whole country blue. I personally feel responsible for trump and i hate it

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hopefully this is a lesson for you to always vote in future elections.

[–] MegaUltraChicken@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

If there are any...

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (1 children)
[–] Breezy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Liberal in a very red state. Plus fear of being a known Democrat sounds rather dangerous now a days.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Do you think people are going to watch you vote? I'm quite curious.

If you can convince the lowest white man he's better than the best colored man, he won't notice you're picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he'll empty his pockets for you.

-Lyndon B. Johnson

[–] HulkSmashBurgers@reddthat.com 7 points 5 days ago

Totally. They're smart enough to know they're getting screwed, but then they do the worst possible thing to lessen the screw.

[–] tdawg@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Unfortunately most people don't think beyond swapping to the other guy when things are bad under the current one

[–] SquatDingloid@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Let's hope we still have elections in 4 years once people are mad at Trump for making the economy worse like in 2020

[–] wildncrazyguy138@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago

It’s as if the sheep decided, “f these boring shepherds, let’s go party with these wolves.”

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (4 children)

ruZZia, China, Musk, Jeff Bezos, and the most important Hulk Hogan ripping his shirt off, are the reasons he won. Let's quit pretending, that without all of the dirty money and influence from foreign countries, this idiot would have won.

[–] JeeBaiChow@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Except that even with these things in place, they could have won, except that 15m voters chose to stay home. Guess which bloc?

[–] evidences@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Not that it makes things better but that number is going to be bunches less than 15 million when everything is said and done. Trump is sitting about a 1 million down from his 2020 vote total and Harris is obviously like 11 million down from Biden's 2020 total but California alone still has almost 7 million votes left to count last I looked and there's still quite a few votes left to count across the rest of the states.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Why did everyone suddenly start misspelling Russia?

[–] chasingtheflow@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Shhh don’t wake the bots

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

So they think this will avoid bots astroturfing? I'm pretty sure they could update their filters in seconds to account for that, if so.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago (1 children)

They tag some of their military assets with 'Z' for battlefield identification

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Because the Russians liked the movie world war z or what? Also I'm still confused why people on Lemmy would adopt that spelling regardless

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Z was being used in ruZZia as a symbol to show support for the invasion. IIRC Z was used by a certain command in that area on tanks and trucks.

People started spelling "Russia" as "ruZZia" to relate it to the Nazi SS and using Z to do so to show distane for the war. I write it with lower case r out of disrespect 🤷

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

Thank you for being the first to actually explain this!

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 days ago

They needed a symbol to spray paint on their tanks to easily differentiate them. Z is simple and it's not a a Cyrillic letter.

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Let's quit pretending, that without all of the dirty money and influence from foreign countries, this idiot would have won.

I think you're wrong here, as least on the money side of things. Harris out-fundraised Trump 3 to 1, taking in almost a billion dollars this cycle. Democrats didn't lose because of dirty money — they had more than enough of their own to compete.

[–] SassyRamen@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

You could be right, but we'll never know what the actual turn out would have been without interference.

In my opinion, it's game over for justice and the environment

[–] massive_bereavement@fedia.io 2 points 5 days ago

Attempt at ripping his shirt off. It was just sad.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 3 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Did the struggling half all vote for Trump? It appears that the breakdown was more split along ethnic, gender and religious lines, and far less economic ones.

[–] Ajen@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I agree with your about the religious and economic demographics, but...

Ethnic? From what I've seen, the only ethnic demographic that wasn't split roughly 50/50 was the black demographic. [correction: Native Americans voted for Trump 2 to 1]

Gender? At least 45% of voters from each gender voted for Trump.

[–] DarkThoughts@fedia.io 3 points 5 days ago

Because people are fucking stupid.