this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
95 points (90.6% liked)

Videos

14268 readers
241 users here now

For sharing interesting videos from around the Web!

Rules

  1. Videos only
  2. Follow the global Mastodon.World rules and the Lemmy.World TOS while posting and commenting.
  3. Don't be a jerk
  4. No advertising
  5. No political videos, post those to !politicalvideos@lemmy.world instead.
  6. Avoid clickbait titles. (Tip: Use dearrow)
  7. Link directly to the video source and not for example an embedded video in an article or tracked sharing link.
  8. Duplicate posts may be removed

Note: bans may apply to both !videos@lemmy.world and !politicalvideos@lemmy.world

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 8 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Wtf what a horrible made up bullshit of those "officials"

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 3 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

I think the officials overreacted, I understand that rabies is a nasty fatal disease. But the euthanasia is completely unnecessary. The officials say it's to determine that the animals don't have rabies after peanut bit one of them. If the animals turned out negative for rabies then it means no danger, if positive the only thing they can do is vaccinate the worker, there's nothing else they can do but wait. Why not just vaccinate the worker and let the animals live?

Also sheltered animals are in no danger of having rabies unless they are bitten by a rabid animal outside.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (1 children)

You cant test for rabies without euthanasing the animal.

"...to rule out rabies, the test must include a full cross-section of tissue from both the brain stem and cerebellum." - https://www.cdc.gov/rabies/php/laboratories/diagnostic.html

He had just taken in a raccoon so the squirrel could have gotten it from that, and they don't know if the owner had been lying about taking it outside.

This is all the owner's fault for not taking the squirrel to a proper animal sanctuary.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world 0 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Let me ask you this. If the animal is tested as rabid. What's the next step for the bitten?

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

If a animal is tested positive the human have to undergo about 2-4 vaccinations that might need to be repeated and will cost a great amount, or they die. The vaccination has a lot of side effects.

[–] deranger@sh.itjust.works -1 points 13 hours ago

It doesn’t have any more potential side effects than any other vaccine. It’s not special in this regard.

[–] wildcardology@lemmy.world -3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

So the euthanasia step is really not needed and just go straight to the vaccination part.

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 11 hours ago

Sure, that makes sense for a country with socialized health care. You still shouldn't keep wild animals as pets.

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 5 points 22 hours ago

he had the thing for 7 years. if it had rabies it would have died already.

[–] kalkulat@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

All pets were at one time wildlife. Killing one to save it... wow.