this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2024
417 points (98.6% liked)

politics

19242 readers
3265 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
  • Former President Donald Trump said that Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s proposal to remove fluoride from the U.S. water systems “sounds okay” to him.
  • Kennedy, who is poised to play a health policy role in a potential Trump administration, recently wrote, “The Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water.”
  • According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, “the safety and benefits of fluoride are well documented and have been reviewed comprehensively by several scientific and public health organizations.”
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FunderPants@lemmy.ca 136 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (55 children)

Two days from now timelines are going split. I don't know what will happen in both, but I can tell you for sure I'd like to avoid the timeline where Trump wins. If for no other reason than all the bad breath this single choice will cause.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 month ago

It’s like Back to the Future’s alternative Biff-world versus the saner reality.

load more comments (54 replies)
[–] Gingerlegs@lemmy.world 68 points 1 month ago (4 children)

If he wins, we are all fucked

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 61 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Oh, every day is going to be like this if Trump wins.

Most of it probably won't be followed through on, but it's going to be some outrageous plan or statement like this every single day.

Like, what other administation could make a scandal out of a NOAA weather prediction? It ultimately meant nothing, but still...

[–] HappycamperNZ@lemmy.world 30 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You know the best part about Biden?

I forgot the US actually had a president. Notice how he's just been able to get along and do stuff?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] lemmy_user_838586@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

Trump will make America great again by making sure our rivers are just as flammable as they were in the late 1960s.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] tiefling@lemmy.blahaj.zone 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This was literally an episode of Parks and Rec. It was supposed to be satire...

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago

There were decades of examples before that of fluoride conspiracies being spouted by kooks and insane people. It's kind of a trope.

[–] svcg@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

People have known that water fluoridation is an international communist plot to sap and impurity our precious bodily fluids since at least the 50s!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 month ago

That's why I only drink grain alcohol and rainwater

[–] _bcron_@lemmy.world 29 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

The Trump White House will advise all U.S​. water systems to remove fluoride from public water.

Municipalities will advise the Trump White House that they will not listen to a man who had his brain eaten by worms

Ahh, the good old days when Trump said 'let states decide' and they decided to ignore his profoundly idiotic ass

I think I remember reading that the prevalence of fluoride in drinking water is the single greatest medical breakthrough in "population health" of the 20th century or something.

Like a fancy CT scan might help someone who needs a CT scan but fluoride helps everyone mitigate dental problems (and the many and varied related issues) all the time.

I guess in fairness dental hygiene has probably improved a lot since fluoride was put in the water, so if it's less important then any potential side effects might be more concerning.

[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I guess this isn't satire anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] UpperBroccoli@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 month ago

But will he make sure you guys keep the lead pipes? They are essential for good health!

[–] Deway@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

What's the big deal with Fluoride in drinking water in the US? Like most European, I don't get fluoride enriched drinking water and it's never been a big deal.

Don't you guys use toothpaste with Fluoride?

[–] ghen@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 month ago

It specifically helps kids who haven't gotten in the habit of brushing properly yet. We have non-fluoride parts of the country that show higher cases of child dental work needed. We also eat a lot of high fructose corn syrup.

Overall for the whole population it is a net gain.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

what does white house “advice” actually mean for this? sounds pretty toothless luckily.

I see what you did there

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 10 points 1 month ago

The Orange Turd has not heard a bad idea he does not like.

[–] dank@lemmy.today 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Obama-appointed US judge Edward Chen found fluoridation could cause developmental damage and lower IQ in children at levels to which the public is generally exposed in drinking water. Though the ruling did not state the level at which fluoridation would damage brains, the levels in US water present an unreasonable risk, the court found.

The EPA now must perform a risk assessment that is among the first steps in setting new limits under the Toxic Substances Control Act.

Armed with a growing body of scientific evidence pointing toward fluoride’s neurotoxicity, public health advocates say the legal win shows they are overcoming “institutional inertia” and the unwillingness of federal public health agencies to admit they may have been wrong.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2024/oct/04/fluoridation-water-epa-risk-assessement

[–] teegus@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 month ago

Though the ruling did not state the level at which fluoridation would damage brains

This right here. The levels have to be many times that in drinking water for it to have any harmful effects.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 month ago

I thought IQ testing itself was scientifically dubious

load more comments
view more: next ›