this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
352 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

59092 readers
6622 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] db2@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Anyone know how to add it to mobile Chrome?

Edit: go to the udm14 site, then open settings/search engine, it'll be in there. I'm not sure if you have to do a search through the site first for it to show up.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 5 points 3 days ago

There is an addon for Firefox mobile

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 176 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Using a search engine that isn't saturated with ads and AI trash also solves this problem.

[–] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 days ago (5 children)
[–] kia@lemmy.ca 40 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] zingo@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I don't know if Bing's search results are better than Google's.

They all suck.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

for me it's much better. I don't think they directly use Bing search by the way, just their index. the algorithm should be theirs if I'm not wrong.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ellvix@lemmy.world 26 points 3 days ago

Startpage if you like Google, DuckDuckGo if you like Bing.

[–] Rogue@feddit.uk 23 points 3 days ago (3 children)
[–] tal@lemmy.today 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Kagi has an AI search option which IIRC is on by default -- or at least was at one point -- where it'll try to also synthesize an answer and stick it in a box with the results, but you can just turn it off in your preferences. I have it off.

There may be a day when we have AI assistants that are so good that their summaries are better than looking at the original source, but I'd put a high bar on that, and think that we've got a way to go.

[–] oktoberpaard@feddit.nl 7 points 3 days ago

It’s off by default, but activated when you end your search query with a question mark. That option can be turned off.

Gotta say, Kagi has been great. It's helped me a lot in work just by Being able to prioritise search Results and rank certain sites higher

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee 11 points 3 days ago

Searx.space

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I started paying for Kagi. Works like Google in 2019. Fast, useful and customizable. One of the best features is hiding results from shit sites like Reddit, which blocks me for using a VPN. $10 well spent just to have that option.

[–] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 days ago

One of the best features is hiding results from shit sites

I do that with the Firefox plugin "Block or Highlight Search Engine Results" from pistom (on github).
Upside: I can see what was hidden in case I need that and it really helps with visibility.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

why would you block reddit results? it's often useful (at least when related to tech, possibly other topics too). I would recommend to install libredirect instead, which redirects reddit to a libreddit/redlib frontend

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I believe what he is saying is that he can’t load Reddit results because Reddit blocks his VPN, so blocking Reddit from search results is useful to him

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] joonazan@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago

It is the best on the market but unfortunately they just use Google underneath plus their own blog index. And at least to me it seems it isn't going in a better direction.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zingo@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I stopped using Whoogle (Privacy engine using Google search) because of the bad search results. Google's fault of course.

Trying SearxNG now.

[–] Mwa@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Same with startpage because google indexing becoming horrible.
But I have some cons. with searxng, earch quality becomes horrible when adding too much sources, and I decided to go with ddg.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 10 points 3 days ago

SXNG has been great for me. Submitted a PR to add more quick-answers, too.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago (3 children)

Which other trustworthy search engines are there? And I don't mean some different frontend or a meta search engine like ddg, sp, kagi, searx(ng), etc... that mostly just use googles, bings or even yandex and beidu results?

Ages ago I configured and hosted yacy for myself, but that was a different time... Are there any real alternatives? With mayor internet companies like cloudflare, social media sites and many others restricting the access to the net and information, searching becomes more and more impossible if you aren't a huge corporation...

[–] Draghetta@lemmy.world 12 points 3 days ago

FYI kagi does its own indexing, it’s not just a frontend

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The two criteria I suggested were "not saturated with ads and AI trash" (technically just the latter would satisfy OP's problem), and DDG meets both of those with no problem. Its AI "assistant" and its ads can both be trivially disabled. I use DuckDuckGo because I love its frontend and because it gives me fewer problems than Google did. I've only ever used alternative search engines that piggyback off the major ones (as you listed: DDG, Startpage, and SearX), so someone else would have to answer that for you.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Well, you and I just have a different understanding of "search engine" then. For me a search engine is something that doesn't forward queries to third parties.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Searx is fancy about it though, It queries everybody and gives you the results that came back from multiple places. This effectively eliminates ads, AI, and unless they all missed it, spam.

[–] cmhe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

I have nothing against any meta search engine, they are very useful, and I use them primarily as well.

However, they are not a true alternative, because they depend on third-party services. The same as Invidious is a very useful, but also not an alternative to YouTube itself, just a different user interface.

[–] regrub@lemmy.world 84 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Lets you turn it off for good...until Google removes that feature

[–] lnxtx@feddit.nl 9 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Imagine Google killing the searching feature.

[–] bokherif@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago

You talk as if it is yet to happen.

[–] Duckytoast@sh.itjust.works 19 points 3 days ago

Yeah imagine.

[–] TotalCasual@lemmy.world 53 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Google search engine is much worse than it used to be and seems to be getting worse.

udm=14 doesn't seem to improve Google search results by a significant margin.

Bing and DuckDuckGo seem to perform better than Google at present.

Google itself is failing. I'm not going to speculate why.

uBlacklist is my current extension for removing spam results.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 14 points 2 days ago

There's been a two pronged assault on it over the years.

Mostly from websites doing anything to spam up the results via SEO and mass produced articles about product recommendations, that are little more than the top 10 selling items of that type on Amazon along with affiliate links.

But also from within as Google morphed from a search company to an advertising company. Especially once they reached peak saturation and that all important growth must continue. I just don't think the capitalism machine works for these tech corporations once they reach the size of Google. How do you even grow from there? Enshittification and eating yourself is the only possible outcome.

[–] Botzo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Lol they put the guy who ran Yahoo into the ground in charge of Google search.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The guy? You mean Marissa Mayer?

[–] moseschrute@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Prabhakar Raghavan

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 48 points 3 days ago (3 children)

To add it to Firefox search, open about:config and add a boolean value browser.urlbar.update2.engineAliasRefresh set to true. This will allow you to manually add search engines. Then open the search settings and click add. Set the URL to https://www.google.com/search?udm=14&q=%s, give it a name and click "Add Engine".

[–] TK420@lemmy.world 29 points 3 days ago

I still like the idea of not using google search as my defacto standard, however once a month I may do an actual google search and this is a nice backup.

Thank you for your work

[–] Alatarius@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 3 days ago

Tried this and it returns as site not found

[–] stefounet123@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Thank you! I've been looking for a way to to do that (for a different use case). Works like a charm!

[–] Sterile_Technique@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Lots of talk about which search engine to use; surprisingly little talk about extensions.

Block or Highlight Search Engine Results is my personal recommendation. Whichever SE you use, when you see a result that's AI slop or a garbage website like Forbes, just add bullshit.com to the filter, set to hide, and you'll never see that trash in a search result ever again.

Be diligent about it for a good week or so, and your search result quality will absolutely explode, whether your using Google, DDG, or several others.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.melroy.org 13 points 3 days ago

As in, forever for good, or the "Microsoft" "for good" user settings paradigm?

[–] rockter@sh.itjust.works 9 points 3 days ago

It would be great if it did anything for SEO, but alas.

Good old six month old articles getting reposted, yup, yup, yup.

load more comments
view more: next ›