this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5032 readers
990 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It's almost exclusively about USA right now and frankly I'm sick of this US-centrism.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] justdoit@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

While I totally agree that climate is a worldwide topic, not sure what you think the options are here…

If the majority of users submit and upvote US based stories, that’s what will appear in the community.

If the majority upvote more global stories, that’s what’ll appear.

The only other option I can think of would be adding a rule prohibiting US stories, but that feels like it’s going too far the other direction, no?

[–] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

I'm not sure what the exact solutions are, I just know there is a problem of cultural dominance. Perhaps a slightly increased standard for international relevance wouldn't be entirely unreasonable? There are sometimes intranational political developments of interest to the rest of the world, but if we're just letting popular vote decide what subscribers see without moderation, then based on initial observation, non-USians will just have to move to more regionally specific communities/instances or consent to cultural assimilation.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'd love to see more content from outside the US. If you want to help out, you can post content about other places.

[–] MrMakabar@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Most new post here have been posted by @silence7, who is clearly an American. One user, means the post will be one sided. Thats not @silence7 fault obviously.

[–] qwamqwamqwam@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Be the change you want to see. Things don't just magically appear on the forum, people just like you have to post them. And if you can't be arsed to do that, then be thankful for what others are willing to provide to you for free.

[–] sudoreboot@slrpnk.net -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If I submit a dozen links per day pertaining to various details about a single game to a general gaming sub, you don't think people would find that kind of annoying? Or what if a TV sub was constantly flooded by a large minority talking about some particular show they're all watching. Maybe USians could have their own climate news sub.

[–] tacoface@slrpnk.net 0 points 1 year ago

I think part of the problem is language. Sure I could post local climate news, but it’s not in English, so what’s the point?