this post was submitted on 25 Oct 2024
49 points (98.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5225 readers
863 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
49
‘We have emotions too’: Climate scientists respond to attacks on objectivity (www.theguardian.com)
submitted 2 weeks ago by piefedderatedd@piefed.social to c/climate@slrpnk.net
3 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 3 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 15 points 2 weeks ago

Apart from the awful title, a very interesting article about how there's a subset of scientists who don't understand (or have forgotten) that the data doesn't speak for itself. Laypeople and politicians certainly won't grasp how it fits into "life in general."

Science communication is necessary and so vital, and it's in short supply, made worse by bad actors with an agenda. If we leave their humanity out of science, we lose out on the very expertise of the people who are able to look at that data and see the big picture.

[–] sinkingship@mander.xyz 12 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

One of those articles that make you feel disgusted about the world we live in.

Thank you to all those scientists trying to throw the rudder around, that get bullied, while trying to save fellow humans.

[–] Nyssa@slrpnk.net 3 points 2 weeks ago

I especially feel for those who work in government. When the Trump admin placed restrictions on the use of certain terminology, it must really be hard to balance ones need for employment and doing good work and remaining true to scientific principles.