this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
8 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10180 readers
206 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Edit: Changed to original source

top 1 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] t3rmit3@beehaw.org 4 points 3 weeks ago

I don't know, I understand his concerns, but I don't personally trust that what we'd get would be better than what we have, in total.

There are states who absolutely need federal oversight, or even just management, of their elections, because they've shown repeatedly that they are in the business of deliberate and persistent disenfranchisement. Then there are states who do much better now than any standard that a federal "bipartisan" commission would push in an emergency...

And who decides if it's an emergency? The commission? The President? SCOTUS?

It's tough because Federalism is a bad system, and creates these problems by its very nature, but this doesn't change or correct for that system, it just creates another actor with vested authority over elections.