The NYTrash is trying to appear unbiased but they can't get there...
He Dreamed of Escaping Gaza. The World Watched ~~Him Burned~~ Zionists Burn Him Alive.
A community for discussing events around the World
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
The NYTrash is trying to appear unbiased but they can't get there...
He Dreamed of Escaping Gaza. The World Watched ~~Him Burned~~ Zionists Burn Him Alive.
I think sentiment is changing. Recently I'm noticing more US mainstream media using language like
Since Israel launched its devastating retaliation for the Hamas-led attack just over a year ago
It's a small thing, it's better than the softer language they would normally use. But, damn, it's not enough.
They are still directly implying the genocide is retaliation. This is the crux of all the propaganda.
Every Israeli expansion has been under the guise of self defense. It always follows the same order:
Oppress Palestinians for long enough, and kill any attempt for a peaceful resolution.
The the Palestinians see no other option and retaliate.
Israel commits a genocide and "defends themselves" onto more land.
I get what you're saying, but being explicitly anti-Zionist would be more biased than the neutral language they used here. You don't want unbiased media, you want media biased towards your values. That's fine, but don't pretend that you're offering a less biased headline.
The “neutral language” you’re describing is called passive voice. It’s used to avoid saying who performed the actions in question and that is a form of bias.
In the last few years, newspapers selective use of passive voice - cloaked as “neutral language” - to shield groups or organizations they’re sympathetic to from police to the idf has come under fire because people recognize it as deflecting blame from the powerful and casting the injustice and violence of those in power as unavoidable tragedy.
He just burned to death, isn’t that sad? Alexa play despacito.
at this point more than just the israelis are responsible for burning him alive
He burned to death in an Israeli strike on a hospital. Who else should be blamed in the story about the effect and meaning of his tragic killing? What particular responsible party should be named in the headline of that story?
I would argue the United States also carries the blame as they've supported Israel's genocide, but that's secondary to the primary point, on which you and I agree.
The U.S. needs to abandon Israel completely. We should have no relationship with them at all at this point other than to protect the innocent from their insatiable blood-thirst.
No, we have a moral responsibility to work to get the war criminals sent to The Hague
Disgusting, and despite the "criticisms" thrown at Israel nothing will change and more innocent people will die.
Meanwhile we have proof that we have leverage; Aid into Gaza went back up after we threatened to withhold weapons from the Israelis.
Wait it did? Got a source?
Gladly, they even let 30 truckloads into northern Gaza. The IDF made an announcement for it and specifically said that they follow international law. Completely ignoring the fact that they had to be threatened to do so.
Any sources that aren't The Jerusalem Post - whose source in the article isn't "Israeli Media"? Cannot find any other sources that match this '30 Truck' number.
It's all Israeli sources because COGAT made the press conferences. I realize COGATs promises aren't worth the paper they're printed on but it shows that they are afraid of the US pulling weapons.
The amount of trucks coming in is nowhere near enough. It's still a downgrade from before which was already barely enough to begin with. Israel is deliberately starving the Palestinian population.
I agree. The only showing here is that the IDF is vulnerable to American pressure.
Nope, Israeli religious extremist terrorists literally killed all the aid workers already.
Thankfully that's not true. They have killed far too many, and targeted them too. But they haven't killed all the helpers.
This is what zionism, with western support, has been doing on a daily basis for 75 years now.
Well, when I worked in Palestine, we only saw a murder about once per week on average (sometimes as long as once per month in a "good" month). Its not every day.
My point is that things are quantitatively much worse now than they have been since 1948.