this post was submitted on 16 Oct 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

Australia

3555 readers
247 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zero_gravitas@aussie.zone 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Crisafulli said he would also aim to change the full preferential voting system, which he labelled “corrupt”, back to optional preferential voting.

Under the current system, it is compulsory for voters to number all boxes on the ballot paper in order of their preference or their vote is not counted.

“Preferences should not be a thing in Queensland elections, and it won’t be if government changes,” he said.

???

[–] vividspecter@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Also, does he mean moving to optional preferential or going to a FPTP system? Frankly, fuck both ideas but FPTP would be the worst.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

He means optional preferential. It's what Queensland council elections use already, and at the time of the elections earlier this year the BCC Lord Mayor made comments about how the Fitzgerald Inquiry had recommended optional preferential and that it was wrong to switch to compulsory. The LNP runs on a very successful "just vote 1" campaign in Council elections, which is one of the reasons they control a 19/27 seat supermajority in BCC (5 Labor, 2 Greens, 1 independent).

I tried finding out why the FI made that recommendation but couldn't find a good answer. I did find other articles that pointed out FI also recommended changes to number of seats & voting system should not be decided by Parliament...and that in 2016 both parties were guilty of breaking that rule—LNP increasing number of seats, Labor switching to compulsory preferential. That turned out to be a fascinating story of powerbroking and political gamesmanship.

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 1 points 15 hours ago

It's not clear to me that moving to optional is what he means:

“Preferences should not be a thing in Queensland elections, and it won’t be if government changes,” he said.

This quote suggests to me he wants to get rid of preferences all together.

The same thing we have for council elections, optional preferential I am pretty sure.

What ever he is trying, looks to me he wants QLD to be like the USA, in more ways than one...

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 12 points 2 days ago

Definitely not something a corrupt person would say.

[–] war_and_peace@aussie.zone 2 points 5 hours ago

The LNP are essentially handicapped as long as developers can't donate. The lnp can go get fked though.