this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
153 points (97.5% liked)

Technology

34409 readers
856 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“We had exercised our right to organize as members of the Alphabet Workers Union-CWA in order to bring both Google and Accenture, a Google subcontractor, to the bargaining table to negotiate on several key demands, including layoff protections.”

Google only started accepting contractors and recruiters because they were expanding before the pandemic. They probably wanted to get rid of both of those anyway.

They will show through internal communication that this was planned all along. Any retaliation protection this union thought they had doesn't exist.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Google has been using Accenture for decades and would have continued to do so.

Union busting in this matter has been proven to be a crime that will not be prosecuted and therefore, it is rampant and flagrant.

[–] IllNess@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

Accenture and Google's relationship has changed throughout the years. They are partners in cloud services. I'm not sure what their role is in other divisions though.

[–] authed@lemmy.ml 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I guess they didn't get enough employees/contractors on-board with the unionization.

[–] TheRaven@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 year ago

Right. The lesson Google is teaching is that everyone should unionize, not just some of us.

[–] whiny9130@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago

Didn't they file a complaint with the labor board and were reinstated with back pay?

[–] philluminati@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I support unionising in general but not for contractors. By definition contractors have agreed to do short term work according to a specific contract. Trying to negotiate the contract later seems dishonest. That’s a very different to a regular long-term open-ended employment contract where unionising makes sense.

[–] anachronist@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

The "contractors" are W-2 employees, they're employed by an external agency rather than by Google itself. This agency then contracts to provide services to Google. It's a bit like if a building outsources their janitorial to A1 Cleaning Services Corp, and then A1's employees unionize. The thing is then it might be legal for the building to cancel the A1 contract, and then for A1 to fire all their employees due to the lost contract, and then for the building to hire A2 to do the same thing. This is a loophole in union busting laws.

load more comments
view more: next ›