Reminds me of the time Trump dumped a M.O.A.B. over Afghanistan shortly after taking office, because he thought it would win the war overnight.
this post was submitted on 03 Oct 2024
103 points (98.1% liked)
World News
32316 readers
1397 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
I can't speak to Trump's rationale, but know of at least one instance where a MOAB was substituted for the normal ordinance in theatre because it was approaching it service rated shelf life.
Explosive ordinance has a shelf life, and once they're expired, they either need to be taken out of supply for servicing, or dismantled and disposed of.
Obliterating a large chunk of landscape and killing countless people because its cheaper than doing hardware maintenance does sound like a US Military tier move.
I mean, yeah, but I think that's placing the US military on a pedestal, with the unsaid implication that they're somehow unique in that regard.
I don't imagine there's many, if any, military forces on earth, who would both be used to invade and occupy foreign lands, and not make similar decisions.
Biggest Military In The World is going to have more of this shit and be in more places where they can casually detonate an 18 kiloton bomb.
The "uniquely American" angle is more just the consequence of our size and the number of theaters of conflict we're active in. I don't imagine there's many, if any, military forces on earth that could operate at this scale for the last 80 years.
does and expired bomb make it more boomy?
No... It risks either not going boom, or some other catastrophic failure like we saw in the early days of the Ukraine war with the S300 and S400 missiles that would U-turn after launch and hit their own launcher, most likely from being improperly stored, not maintained, and/or outside of their rated service life.
It's definitely skeptical. The MOAB was designed to literally collapse parts of mountains. This doesn't really look like a similar result.
If you can see buildings still standing right next to the blast like this, then it was just a glorified pipe bomb. Dont get me wrong its fucked up anyways, but it just really looks like a fairly tiny explosion.
Seems either unremarkable/not new or fudged
Weapons analyst Sascha Lange of German SWP speaking at Deutsche Welle pointed out multiple discrepancies in the released Russian video and expressed his skepticism about the Russian claim
Same source as you linked.
Its a big ol thermobaric, which sucks but isn't ground breaking (except literally lol)
Title of this post seems rather hyperbolic.
Those damn type 12 liberals