this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
88 points (100.0% liked)

science

14410 readers
565 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] No_Eponym@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

scientist: That's weird...

I feel like we've seen this movie before...

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The newfound galaxy appears to be in the midst of a star-birth sprint, and its reservoirs of gas and dust are being pummeled with countless photons of light. It is this light the JWST has managed to see.

Neat!

[–] clmbmb@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Photons if light? What other kinds of photons exist?

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

They are paraphrasing from the original news release, but poorly.

The gas cloud is being hit with so many photons of light from the stars that it is shining extremely brightly

Photons of light from the stars, as opposed to light from other things.

Generally poorly worded, but I can see what they are trying to convey. But they could have done it better.

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Space.com really doesn't have good quality articles.

[–] NegativeInf@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Any headline pumping site, I always go find the original cited article. I trust the researchers who did the thing over someone who has a minor understanding and a good domain name.

Tho, I do like the articles on phys.org. They often seem to have direct quotes from the authors of the research, like they actually spoke to someone. But they are less space focused and more general science news from across the spectrum.

[–] bbuez@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

If you'd like a real answer, because of particle-wave duality, all electro magnetic emmission can be quantized as photons, including radio waves. Now is it redunant to say photons of light instead of just light? Yes

[–] Zron@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The kind where science communicators have to account for the lowest common denominator of reader that may not have payed attention in high school when the teacher was talking about photons being the reason for light.

[–] bbuez@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Well light is also a wave and radio is also photons, and I'm sure that's not taught in high school

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

The process of scientific discovery is never “Eureka!” but rather “That’s funny…”

[–] Xeroxchasechase@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Rule number one is never outshine your stars!