this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
104 points (94.1% liked)

Technology

59373 readers
3169 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So they have concepts of a plan?

[–] NaibofTabr@infosec.pub 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The plan is to have a plan.

[–] Static_Rocket@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

We'll have a timeline for the plan to make the plan by next quarter

[–] ocassionallyaduck@lemmy.world 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nope. I quit their Google bullshit ages ago. Moto 360 was a brutal betrayal.

Get a withings scanwatch or something that is "dumb" enough to be an excellent and nice looking watch, hugely long battery life, and has all the health features that matter.

It looks sharply professional, I charge it once a month, and the updates for it don't constantly make it run worse to push features in a different part of their product line..

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The fossil gen 6 hybrid is my strap of choice. E-ink like the withings, but the whole face, and analog hands that have a separate 2 year battery, so if the “smart” runs out of juice you still get the time.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't have a strap-on, but I can see how it would be fun to use one.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I bet you are fun at a party 😉

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yup. One 🥳 party 🎉! 🍆 🍑 🍋 🍍 🍅 🍇. There's no strap-on emoji unfortunately, but imagine a strap-on party. LOL 🤣.

[–] ravhall@discuss.online 2 points 1 month ago

I don’t have to imagine it 😉😉😉

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Btw there are things called "screws" and they can look cool on a more traditionally male watch or you can put it on the back plate androgynous or female watch. You dont need glue for waterproofing, thats just anti-repair propaganda. Look at every mechanical watch, gshock, garmin, etc they all have screws and 100,200 or even more meters of water resistance. If the battery, screen, back assembly and maybe the buttons are repairable thats already good for a smartwatch.

[–] militaryintelligence@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Make parts available. Right to repair isn't wholly about designing products a certain way, but not allowing apple to monopolize certain parts.

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 month ago

And my axe ! .... I meant firmwares.

[–] Archer@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Just talk to the iFixit people, they probably already have extensive notes

[–] umami_wasbi@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Actually, how hard can it be? My old cheap ass Casio can have its battery replaced and waterproof already.

Sure, smartwatches have more bells and whistles but not as complicated as a mechanical watch, right?

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not as complicated, but the parts are bigger. Few would want an even bigger smart watch just to get repairability.

[–] Teils13@lemmy.eco.br 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

just make it easily repairable by third stores with minimally qualified people and cheap tools, like digital watches already were and are. Or, make a full collecting and recycling tax to be paid by those uncaring clients.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Or, make a full collecting and recycling tax to be paid by those uncaring clients.

No, that's not good enough. "Right to repair" is kind of an unfortunate name, because it really shouldn't be just about repair. My property rights include a right to modify, too, and letting manufacturers off the hook by doing first-party replacements instead of facilitating work by third-parties is not sufficient to protect that right!

[–] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'd settle for first party repair and a repair window of up to 20 years.

Modification is great and should always be legal... But I'd take the win to get away from so much throwaway technology.

[–] interurbain1er@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It is. Making anything easier to disassemble requires connectors which are a huge tradeoff in terms of space Vs features. Screws take a whole lot of space especially in something you want as thin as possible such as a watch.

Nowadays the direction is embedding of passive and even active components directly into the PCB layers and an increase of the number of layers. That means that if any of them fails there's nothing to be done, or at least not without equipments that cost way too much to be worthwhile to anyone.

In a few years, microelectronic systems will be mostly just one big custom die with the processing units and all accompanying mosfet, inductors, capacitors and resistors directly etched into a 25 layers PCB with barely any surface mounted components. Even lithium batteries can been embedded and most likely will.

If you want something totally serviceable you will have to sacrifice on size.

[–] jlh@lemmy.jlh.name 3 points 1 month ago

Sure, but people probably don't expect ram slots on a smart watch. Just a replaceable screen, housing, mobo, dials, and battery would do a lot.

[–] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

$200 bucks more on the price should do it!

[–] ftbd@feddit.org 1 points 1 month ago

Seems like something you would think about while, you know, designign a product? And not after its release?

[–] abcdqfr@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Meanwhile, in the engineering dungeon