this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2024
92 points (100.0% liked)

Free and Open Source Software

17783 readers
132 users here now

If it's free and open source and it's also software, it can be discussed here. Subcommunity of Technology.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 18 points 7 hours ago

Not only invidious I guess, they want the user to login when too many videos has been watched on an IP address. So also web browsers on a VPN for example

[–] Ignacio@beehaw.org 15 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Another reason to ditch corporate pages and embrace freedom.

[–] als@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

Sadly the amount and variance of videos on peertube pales in comparison to youtube. I need my Sherlock Holmes audio books 😩

I really wish more youtube producers would cross post to other platforms.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 9 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Have they added safety features like denying follows yet?

Also, they really need to create apps for all platforms, this would increase their popularity and usability.

[–] thingsiplay@beehaw.org 7 points 6 hours ago

I was wondering yesterday why no instance was working, because I always share at least one Invidious link together when sharing YouTube links.

BTW it's not fully blocked, if you can install Invidious locally and use it. But that's not a route I want to go.

[–] fine_sandy_bottom@lemmy.federate.cc 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

This is saddening.

I know the invidious contributors have been working on this over the last few months. Looks like they finally got there only to have youtube slam the door. That's a real gut punch.

I already switched to running an instance at home instead of my VPS, so this news doesn't change much for me personally but it's a demonstration that youtube is actively seeking to block the project.

As with reddit / lemmy, I doubt a viable alternative will emerge until youtube has become well and truly offensive.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 1 points 26 minutes ago* (last edited 25 minutes ago)

As with reddit / lemmy, I doubt a viable alternative will emerge until youtube has become well and truly offensive.

Even after it has this is very unlikely because part of the appeal of youtube is getting paid for work and most people either don't have the money to pay for it, choose not to or hate the platforms through which creators ask to get paid through.

Like it or not, either it'll be another tech company who will later do this exact same thing or we need more people willing to pay and less shitty platforms through which they can do so i.e. not VC backed/supported.

[–] SweetCitrusBuzz@beehaw.org 3 points 2 hours ago

Some piped instances are still working, thankfully.

[–] jabathekek@sopuli.xyz 2 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

What does "fully" mean? I'm watching Dan fucking Rath going on a hilarious rant rn on jing.

[–] captainkangaroo@discuss.tchncs.de 21 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 48 minutes ago)

According to one of the maintainers

YouTube/Google has patched the latest workaround that we had in order to restore the video playback functionality.

Right now we have no other solutions/fixes. You may be able to get Invidious working on residential IP addresses (like at home) but on datacenter IP addresses Invidious won't work anymore.

[–] morrowind@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 hours ago

Some instances will continue for a bit, but it's probably a matter of time, or until invidious figures out another method