this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
77 points (100.0% liked)

News

7 readers
7 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
 

The fundamentalist group thinks Meta’s content policy, which includes a ban on support or praise for terrorist or hate groups, is “intolerant”

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] regal@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How is this not a the onion article?

[–] stopthatgirl7@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because we live in the stupidest timeline.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

To paraphrase Earnest Hemingway: "The hardest thing about writing fiction is it has to make logical sense, while reality does not"

[–] jared@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

What a world.

[–] Madison_rogue@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Sometimes art imitates life. Sometimes life imitates art; this is one of those occasions.

[–] LinusWorks4Mo@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

unfortunately our version of the universe is the one all the other ones laugh about

[–] dystop@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

lol elon musk's social standing continues to improve.

[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

elon musk’s social standing

He was funded, in part, for the twitter purchase by the Saudi Royal family famed for solving/silencing dissenting journalistic opinions with a bone saw....

Some would say ISIS's endorsement is a step-up in that regard, but I consider it par for the course.

[–] autumn@reddthat.com 6 points 1 year ago

Ok that headline is pretty good

[–] DevCat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Surprised the GOP hasn't added their endorsement as well.

[–] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

That's one point for Elon.. i guess?