this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2023
0 points (50.0% liked)

politics

19090 readers
4363 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States pays interest on approximately $850 billion in debt held by the People’s Republic of China. China, however, is currently in default on its sovereign debt held by American bondholders.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Arotrios@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The title is mainly clickbait. The bonds they're talking about were sold in 1938 by the US backed Republic of China, which at the time was fighting a civil war with the Peoples Republic of China (Maoists). The RoC lost, and retreated to Taiwan. The PRoC then assumed control of the country, and decided that it wasn't interested in paying the debts of the government it had just vanquished.

However, under international law, when the PRoC took over China, they also assumed responsibility for paying those bond holders. Nobody has gotten them to pay up except the UK when the transfer of Hong Kong was up for consideration.

So basically, this is a 70 year old debt that was taken out against China's former government, and the current government really has no urgency to address it.

As @mazelado pointed out, this is an opinion piece by the Heritage Foundation, so the motivations in writing it are suspect, especially as it's specifically pushing the Biden administration to fight this very old fight. You would have thought that if had really been a pressing matter, Trump would have handled it when he started the US / China tradewar right before COVID, as it was clear Don didn't have any qualms pushing potentially destructive diplomatic policies that were unpopular to the Chinese.

[–] mazelado@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Given that the source of this opinion piece is The Heritage Foundation I'm skeptical.

[–] Figaro2x@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] mazelado@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are a very influential, very conservative American think tank. They advocate for things like anti-communism, neoconservativism, the Christian right, smaller government, bigger military, traditional family values, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, white supremecist ideas, voting restrictions - generally all the most destructive policies of the last 50 years.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What is wrong with traditional family values and anti communism?

[–] Mayoman68@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Because "family values" in US discourse is usually code for homophobia and sexism, while "anti-communism" is usually just racism, classism and xenophobia.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah saying "usually" and assuming a US discourse while not explaining what is wrong with a traditional family value and anti communism is not what I expected. Should have know that people only think in USA while in their "America bad" mind state. My bad.

Thing is, ironically, the only people whom have treated me and my people with racism, classism and xenophobia are leftists, be from Europe or north America. Weird.

[–] Mayoman68@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What is your ethnicity if I may ask? Because the anti communism bit does vary per society somewhat, but "traditional family values" are usually a far more constant in discouraging a wide variety of perfectly fine things.

[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know what ethnicity I am, but leftists love to call me and my people brown gusano even tho we are not from Cuba

[–] Lukecis@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I'll be honest, I dont think thats what anti-communism is.

[–] TommySalami@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

These concepts are perverted into justification for actions that are either entirely irrelevant or only related to these values through a very, very specific lens.

An example is family values being used as a cudgel against acceptance of LGBTQ individuals/communities for quite some time now. Or how "communism" quickly became a synonym for "not explicitly conservative".

[–] yhorm@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

if you owe your bank manager a modest debt you are in his power; if you owe a huge debt, he is in yours.

[–] IMongoose@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

I bet china will change addresses without updating their forms.

[–] kurosawaa@programming.dev -1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What a dumb article. Britain was broke in the 80s and needed the money and pressed the issue. China was weak at the time and wanted Hong Kong back peacefully. Under those circumstances it made since to pay the debt. Today China has the second largest economy in the world and zero incentive to pay back America, and no one expects them too.

There is no such magic thing as calling in a debt. If China is in default and no one cares, the debt practically does not exist. Americans complaining about it won't affect China's interest rates or anything else.

[–] Compactor9679@lemm.ee -3 points 1 year ago

No if you have Biden there.... Helping them out all the way

load more comments
view more: next ›