this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
179 points (95.0% liked)

politics

19144 readers
5938 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Sources say campaign is concerned that Trump may engage in the kind of self-sabotage that turned off voters in 2020

Donald Trump’s campaign is most concerned going into the debate against Kamala Harris with the former president’s mood, afraid that the mercurial Trump could engage in the kind of self-sabotage that turned off voters in the 2020 presidential election, according to people familiar with the situation.

The campaign’s internal refrain is whether they get “happy Trump” or “angry Trump”, the people said, as they count down the days to perhaps the final presidential debate this cycle.

Tuesday night’s televised debate is widely seen as a crux moment in the rebooted 2024 campaign. Since Joe Biden dropped out of the race after a campaign-killing debate performance crystalized fears over his age and mental acuity, Harris has turned the race on its head.

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tacosanonymous@lemm.ee 95 points 1 month ago

Yet both of those are still the rapey version.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 45 points 1 month ago

Hear me out, but aren't these people supposed to be professional?

Wondering whether "happy" or "angry" variants of a person will show up should stop being a thing around sixteen to eighteen years of age.

Maybe thes story should read: "Trump grossly unfit for office and the Republican party is so badly broken that they can't manage to replace him"?

[–] gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

Honestly this is going to be the first bit of content including trump that I’m going to willingly watch for entertainment in YEARS. I anticipate Harris absolutely taking him apart.

[–] anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 month ago

Yeah, for sure. I sure hope she brings her A game and can bait him into being a psychopath, regardless of which Trump shows up. Isn't that right, other Barry?

[–] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I had not thought about it, but I didn't have any interest in the Biden/Trump debate. I knew what to expect, and Biden's disappointing showing just made me bored with the whole thing.

I'm actually excited to see Harris pick Trump apart tomorrow, and I hope she doesn't take her foot off his neck the whole time.

Yep, same. I knew precisely how the Biden/Trump debate was going to pan out - actually, it went worse than I thought it would, if I’m completely honest.

Seeing someone who is actually at/near the peak of their political game and mental aptitude just clinically disassemble the narcissistic psychopathic fascist is going to warm my heart tomorrow evening, because fascists should be given no quarter under any circumstances.

[–] VaalaVasaVarde@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I'll wait for the memes and then John Stewart's highlights.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We can rest assured that calm and collected Trump won’t be showing up anywhere anytime soon

[–] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Angry lying Trump will appear and the press will say Trump won the debate because Harris was low energy.

[–] LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago

If Harris hands his ass to him, mainstream media will label her being aggressive and crazy.

If Harris sticks to well articulated policy answers against trumps lies and craziness, mainstream media will label her as low energy.

Heads you lose, tails I win.

[–] N0body@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I think Trump is going to snort enough of whatever he snorts that he shows up energized. What he says will be rambling nonsense, as it always is, but he'll say it confidently. The story on the Trump side will be that he exceeded expectations, and that he's going to gain momentum again.

Harris is more of an X factor, but the buildup to the debate (felon vs. prosecutor) means that she has to win decisively in the eyes of both the left and the middle just to meet expectations. I hope she somehow exceeds them or has a few moments that steal the show, but it's more likely that Trump being able to speak semi-coherently will be the top story regardless of anything Harris does.

I hope I'm wrong.

[–] krashmo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I've been wondering the same thing for a long time now. People seem so excited to see Harris "beat" Trump in a debate but it's obvious that will never happen in any meaningful sense. Trump's supporters are clearly not using any traditional (or rational) metric to evaluate his public speaking and people who don't support Trump will only find things to nitpick Harris on. I don't see the upside for Harris unless she knocks it out of the park and that's such a stupid situation to be in considering the obvious disparity in the quality of these two candidates.

[–] GreenSkree@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm convinced our media is hell-bent on promoting Trump at any opportunity.

I feel like Trump could do anything on that stage and the story pushed out by the media will be some weird criticism about how disappointing Harris' performance was.

Like, Trump could answer every single question with a rant about how cheeseburgers just aren't as good as they used to be and no-one would bat an eye. Then the story for weeks will be about how "Harris just wasn't detailed enough about how her economic policies. She didn't even mention how the Distiller's Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS)/cash corn ratio would change per week over the next decade or two. Harris clearly is too light on the policy front."

I hope I'm wrong, but I've come to expect the worst from our media lately.

[–] ysjet@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Of course. The media wants outrage, scandals, they want DRAMA. A competent, viable government does not produce those.things, so they love trump. Trump is ratings, even as he burns down our nation and sells the charcoal to foreign countries.

[–] timbuck2themoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 month ago

Yep. Im more worried than excited. I see very little opportunity that trump takes a hit and a lot of chances for Harris to falter. Of course that's double standards considering trump is most likely dementia addled, drugged up, and has no expectation of coherence but that's apparently just OK now to a disgustingly large amount of people.

[–] Nougat@fedia.io 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And you know Harris is training to trigger angry trump

[–] finley@lemm.ee 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is my bet. She’s very good at doing that just with speeches and campaign ads. Just imagine how great she’ll do in person!

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Probably all she has to do is just have a moment where she emits a normal human female laugh directed at donnie.

That seems to put donnie (and a lot of his cult) into orbit on the triggered scale. They were crying when she "cackles" at nearly anything, imagine if it's clear that she is laughing at donnie.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 month ago

Oh man let's see Trump try to make fun of her "weird laugh" to her face. Oh wait, he's a fucking wimp.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Hey my bet is on stupid trump!

[–] kevindqc@lemmy.world 15 points 1 month ago

That's cheating

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Wait, there is a "happy trump"? I'm not sure I've ever seen him do a normal human laugh and he usually just gives that weird grimace that is supposed to be a smile usually the same time as that weird thumbs-up for photo ops.

[–] Cornelius_Wangenheim@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You ever see that video of him with Epstein? He was genuinely happy joking around with his fellow pedo.

[–] the_crotch@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I hope they argue about their golf games for like 10 minutes like Biden and Trump did. That made me really proud to be an American and confident about our electoral process.

[–] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

I’m just hoping the stress causes some sort of fatal conniption. I couldn’t care less about their feelings.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

"Advisers"

lol. As if he actively listens to anyone, ever.

"Diaper changers" yeah, say that. That's what they are.

[–] kikutwo@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

More like Dementia Trump.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I hope there are some savoy options traders that picked this week for some puts. Unless he brings Happy Trump and some miracles, NYSE:DJT gonna make Donnie throw mustard @8:30 est.

[–] RamblingPanda@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 month ago

Why not both? And all of them will be incoherent and rambling.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

Thanks I hate living in this country.

[–] casmael@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

‘According to people familiar with the situation’ lol