this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
50 points (94.6% liked)

science

14436 readers
159 users here now

just science related topics. please contribute

note: clickbait sources/headlines aren't liked generally. I've posted crap sources and later deleted or edit to improve after complaints. whoops, sry

Rule 1) Be kind.

lemmy.world rules: https://mastodon.world/about

I don't screen everything, lrn2scroll

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alphacyberranger@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Poor cameraman stuck in space for 1.8 billion years Guess it's true that the cameraman never dies.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I’m a bit confused by the video reconstruction I’m not going to lie: https://youtu.be/_LJG68AmZxI

[–] just_another_person@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What's the confusion? Maybe I can help.

Did you realize it was working backwards?

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 4 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Ohhhhh yes that’s it. It was also so much more movement than I was expecting! I was expecting us to go from pangea glob to continents and then some shifty shifty but man those tectonics were BUSY.

[–] waggz@programming.dev 2 points 3 weeks ago

Pangaea is only the most recent supercontinent, and therefore the most known. there are believed to be several more iterations in this cycle of combining and breaking up large landmasses.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Lots and lots of convection in that mantle.

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

The working backwards was interesting, but also fascinating how the ratio of land to sea was so much different at the start.

[–] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

Is the land sea ratio due primarily to sea level changes?